Different interventions can independently improve athletic performance via different central or peripheral mechanisms, but little is known about their potential combination. We tested the effects of seven combined interventions (enhanced recovery package [ERP]) on performance during intermittent high‐intensity cycling compared with placebo. Sixteen trained men (maximal power output: 5.0 ± 0.5 W・kg−1) completed six 30‐s cycling sprints with 3‐min breaks in‐between under ERP, placebo, and control conditions. The ERP combined neck cooling, carbohydrate and caffeine mouth rinsing, carbohydrate and water ingestion, hyperventilation, hyperoxia, and potentiation maneuvers. Power output, heart rate, blood lactate concentration, rate of perceived exertion, and gas exchange were compared between the ERP and placebo conditions. Mean power output was higher during ERP compared with placebo (570 ± 74 W vs. 560 ± 71 W, p < 0.001, dz = 1.15). Heart rate was higher (+3 ± 4 bpm, p = 0.012) during ERP, as was breathing frequency (+2.4 ± 4.0 breaths・min−1, p = 0.028) and respiratory exchange ratio (+0.12 ± 0.06, p < 0.001). Oxygen uptake was 80 ± 109 mL・min−1 lower (p = 0.013) for ERP. No differences were found with regards to the rate of perceived exertion or blood lactate concentration. Performance gains with ERP were small in magnitude but consistent across individuals. The ERP might have prevented a loss of aerobic efficiency or increased reliance on anaerobic energy. Testing combined interventions might increase the chances to see beyond daily variability in practice.