2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11250-020-02409-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of cage type on performance, welfare, and microbiological properties of laying hens during the molting period and the second production cycle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most obvious manifestations are the regrowth of new feathers, decreased mortality rate, improved eggshell quality [15][16][17][18], and gradual recovery of ELR to SPEP, which is higher than the premolting level [2]. Additionally, the abundance of bacteria in the feces [19] and bone strength [20,21] are also higher than before. Therefore, FM of hens is of substantial importance to increase the utilization life of aging hens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most obvious manifestations are the regrowth of new feathers, decreased mortality rate, improved eggshell quality [15][16][17][18], and gradual recovery of ELR to SPEP, which is higher than the premolting level [2]. Additionally, the abundance of bacteria in the feces [19] and bone strength [20,21] are also higher than before. Therefore, FM of hens is of substantial importance to increase the utilization life of aging hens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One female chick from each of the BAR-1 hens was randomly selected at the hatch, and it was sacrificed by cervical dislocation. The tibia and femur bones of chick were separated, and weight, length, and width values were determined (Onbaşılar et al, 2018;2020).…”
Section: Hatching Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The egg shell microscopic characteristics, the ash, and the Ca levels of shell were determined as explained above. The tibia and femur bones were separated and the weight, length, and width of each of the bones were determined (Onbaşılar et al, 2018;2020).…”
Section: Embryo Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distances of 60 mm for tibia and 40 mm for femur were established between the two fixed points supporting the bone. The maximum force and deformation at maximum force (DMF) were recorded (Onbaşılar et al, 2020; Simske et al, 1991). For mineral analysis, bone samples were defatted using chloroform and methanol (2:1) for 72 h, oven‐dried, ashed, crushed, and digested with 8 ml HCl and 2 ml nitric acid.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%