1984
DOI: 10.3354/meps014165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of canopy removal on the understory algal community structure of coastal forests of Macrocystis pyrifera from southern South America

Abstract: Communities with similar physiognomy often have been expected to show similar ecological responses to experimental manipulations. This is the case in geographically disjunct communities of Macrocystis pyrifera, most of which have been described as showing notoriously similar patterns of vegetational stratification. Comparison of the ecological responses of the second and third vegetational strata to the removal of the floating canopy of M. pyrifera in forests in southern Chile point to differences with equival… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
62
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…-The coast of the west Pacific margin of the Patagonian Archipelago is exposed to the oceanic waves and shows an intertidal kelp belt of Durvillea antartica (Chamisso) Harriot, 1892 and Lessonia nigrescens Bory, 1826 (see : Alveal, 1970;Romo and Alveal, 1977;Santelices, 1980;Santelices et al, 1977). This belt is associated with many species (e.g..Concholepas concholepas (Brugiere,1789), Taliepus dentatus (Milne-Edwards, 1834), Scurria scurra (Lesson, 1830), Chiton granosus Frembly, 1827, Sicyases sanguineus Müller and Troschel, 1843) which are typical of these ecological situations and that do not inhabit protected channels and sounds of the inner archipelago, determined by vast mantles of Macrocystis pyrifera (Linnaeus) C. Agardh, 1820, with a subtidal mantle of Lessonia vadosa Searles, 1973 (see Santelices and Ojeda, 1984). The distribution of these kelp belts must be taken into account in further fish studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-The coast of the west Pacific margin of the Patagonian Archipelago is exposed to the oceanic waves and shows an intertidal kelp belt of Durvillea antartica (Chamisso) Harriot, 1892 and Lessonia nigrescens Bory, 1826 (see : Alveal, 1970;Romo and Alveal, 1977;Santelices, 1980;Santelices et al, 1977). This belt is associated with many species (e.g..Concholepas concholepas (Brugiere,1789), Taliepus dentatus (Milne-Edwards, 1834), Scurria scurra (Lesson, 1830), Chiton granosus Frembly, 1827, Sicyases sanguineus Müller and Troschel, 1843) which are typical of these ecological situations and that do not inhabit protected channels and sounds of the inner archipelago, determined by vast mantles of Macrocystis pyrifera (Linnaeus) C. Agardh, 1820, with a subtidal mantle of Lessonia vadosa Searles, 1973 (see Santelices and Ojeda, 1984). The distribution of these kelp belts must be taken into account in further fish studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only type of interaction detected was interspecific competition. Alternatively, canopy removal has also resulted in patterns of succession that do not immediately result in increased recruitment by the species removed , Santelices & Ojeda 1984a, and papers cited therein). This does not appear to be the pattern for this system (Smith 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other examples can be discerned from published studies of marine macroalgal assemblages (e.g. Pearse & Hines 1979, Kastendiek 1982, Santelices & Ojeda 1984, Edwards 1998, but this approach has not been widely applied. Classification of response groups may be particularly useful for grouping understory algae in subtidal kelp forests where, due to the synergistic effects of a floating surface canopy and a stipitate understory canopy, light regimes are highly variable in space and time (Reed & Foster 1984, Edwards 2004, the present study).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Edwards 1998, Dayton et al 1999 or groups of species (e.g. Reed & Foster 1984, Santelices & Ojeda 1984, Kennelly 1987b. One method commonly used for grouping species has been to combine those with similar morphologies (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%