2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11829-021-09812-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of cardenolides of milkweed plants on immunity of the monarch butterfly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our field trials, we did note that a small percentage of monarchs were indeed attacked and, apparently, consumed by jor ō spiders (n = 7, or 20%). However, it is possible that this rate is atypical, or higher than normal, because the monarchs we used had been reared on a milkweed that is naturally low in cardenolide concentrations [28]. There are over 100 species of milkweeds in North America, and each differs in their cardenolide levels [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our field trials, we did note that a small percentage of monarchs were indeed attacked and, apparently, consumed by jor ō spiders (n = 7, or 20%). However, it is possible that this rate is atypical, or higher than normal, because the monarchs we used had been reared on a milkweed that is naturally low in cardenolide concentrations [28]. There are over 100 species of milkweeds in North America, and each differs in their cardenolide levels [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to these findings, in Grammia incorrupta , the concentration of IGs did not affect immune responses, when caterpillars were fed IG-containing plants ( Smilanich et al, 2011 ). Similarly, the amount of cardenolides present in different host plants did not affect the immune response of cardenolide-sequestering monarch butterflies Danaus plexippus ( Adams et al, 2021 ). Furthermore, gene expression analysis demonstrated that monarch butterflies did not show differential immune responses in monarch butterflies to the common protozoan parasite Ophryocystis elektroscirrha infection ( Tan et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Physiological Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cell-mediated immune response can be tested by melanisation [using dextran beads and nylon filament ( Laurentz et al, 2012 ; Smilanich et al, 2009 )] and haemocyte attributes [such as enlargement, agglutination, denucleation, shape distortion, and abnormal staining of the cells ( Muchoney et al, 2022 ; Perveen and Ahmad, 2017 )]. Similarly, a humoral immune response can be estimated using biochemical assays [phenoloxidase activity ( Barthel et al, 2016 ), relative protein concentration ( Rahman et al, 2004 ), lysozyme-like activity ( Charles and Killian, 2015 )] and zone of inhibition assays [using lipopolysaccharide (a cell wall component of bacteria) in the form of antimicrobial growth ( Adams et al, 2021 )]. Therefore, for assessing the immune response, the best would be to combine the methods such as bioassays, genetic analyses, microscopy, and molecular techniques.…”
Section: Physiological Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, AtMYC2, AtMYC3, and AtMYC4 act to decrease the feeding of Spodoptera littoralis by regulating glucosinolate biosynthesis ( Schweizer et al, 2013 ). Moreover, AtMYC2 can directly bind to the promoters of terpenoid synthesis genes ( TPS10 , TPS11 , and TPS21 ) and activate their expression to promote terpenoid synthesis, thereby enhancing terpenoid-mediated direct and indirect plant resistance to pests ( Fernandez-Calvo et al, 2011 ; Adams et al, 2021 ). In Oryza sativa , the OsMYC2 -RNAi lines showed enhanced resistance against bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%