2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2021.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, there is some retention bias in the sample. Third, due to the nature of the design, causal conclusions cannot be drawn; however, these results are in line with the few randomized trials on CR in countries of the EMR [10] and hence it is likely the effects are robust. Indeed, there was no control group, and in future evaluation it will be important to incorporate such a comparison arm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Second, there is some retention bias in the sample. Third, due to the nature of the design, causal conclusions cannot be drawn; however, these results are in line with the few randomized trials on CR in countries of the EMR [10] and hence it is likely the effects are robust. Indeed, there was no control group, and in future evaluation it will be important to incorporate such a comparison arm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…CR programs have been widely recommended as an adjuvant in the treatment of numerous cardiovascular diseases, including CCC [22][23][24]. In a pioneer study, Lima et al [10] conducted a randomised clinical trial aiming to evaluate the effects of a physical exercise program in 40 patients with CCC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, participation results in 20% lower mortality and morbidity [ 5 ], including re-hospitalization and revascularization, which are a major expense to health systems [ 6 ]. Evidence from LMICs also support these significant benefits [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%