2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of catalyst preparation route and promoters (Ce and Zr) on catalytic activity of CuZn/CNTs catalysts for hydrogen production from methanol steam reforming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methanol conversion and H 2 selectivity were as high as 97.8% and 99.0%, respectively, while the CO selectivity was 0.4% at 300 • C. The activity of the catalyst was still stable after 40 h of operation. Catalysts prepared by traditional preparation methods have some defects, such as an uneven surface, poor contact between the two metals, and uncontrolled particle morphology with agglomeration [79,80]. Therefore, there is a need to improve the traditional synthesis method to optimize the performance of the catalyst.…”
Section: Improving Preparation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The methanol conversion and H 2 selectivity were as high as 97.8% and 99.0%, respectively, while the CO selectivity was 0.4% at 300 • C. The activity of the catalyst was still stable after 40 h of operation. Catalysts prepared by traditional preparation methods have some defects, such as an uneven surface, poor contact between the two metals, and uncontrolled particle morphology with agglomeration [79,80]. Therefore, there is a need to improve the traditional synthesis method to optimize the performance of the catalyst.…”
Section: Improving Preparation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some reports have also explored novel preparation methods. For example, the Ce-CuZn/CNTs catalyst prepared by microwave-assisted polyols had a better catalytic performance than those prepared by impregnation and coprecipitation [80]. There have also been CuO/ZnO/Al 2 O 3 catalysts prepared by microwave-assisted solution combustion [76], and the effect of the preparation method was also obvious.…”
Section: Improving Preparation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1(c), † it's clear that there is no significant change in the crystal structure of the carbon nanotubes after the introduction of NiO and Ni. 20 What's more, the peak of nickel oxide becomes not obvious after 4 h reduction, indicating that the catalyst can be further reduced. Thus, the presence of nickel oxide in the Ni-NiO/CNTs catalyst calcined for 2 h can be attributed to the inadequate reduction.…”
Section: Catalyst Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three methods have been extensively used in obtaining the catalyst for MSR. Shahsavar et al 19 prepared Cu Zn/CNTs catalysts by coprecipitation method, impregnation method, and microwave-assisted polyol method, respectively. Finally, it was found that the catalysts prepared by different preparation methods had different catalytic performances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three methods have been extensively used in obtaining the catalyst for MSR. Shahsavar et al 19 . prepared Cu Zn/CNTs catalysts by coprecipitation method, impregnation method, and microwave‐assisted polyol method, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%