2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of cation salinity on the dynamic interfacial tension and viscoelasticity of a water-oil system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be noticed that the experimental IFT profile tends to be decreased over time to reach a minimum value at the equilibrium stage and then remains constant with the interface aging time. Conceptually, the obtained dynamic behavior of IFT is believed to be caused by the adsorption kinetics of interfacially active molecules (i.e., CTAB) at liquid interfaces, where the adsorption kinetics of CTAB molecules can be controlled by mass transfer phenomena from the bulk in the nanofluid phase into an adsorbed state or vice versa . Between every two immiscible fluids, there are several variables to monitor the adsorption and desorption of the surfactant at the interface area as well as the diffusive movement .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It can be noticed that the experimental IFT profile tends to be decreased over time to reach a minimum value at the equilibrium stage and then remains constant with the interface aging time. Conceptually, the obtained dynamic behavior of IFT is believed to be caused by the adsorption kinetics of interfacially active molecules (i.e., CTAB) at liquid interfaces, where the adsorption kinetics of CTAB molecules can be controlled by mass transfer phenomena from the bulk in the nanofluid phase into an adsorbed state or vice versa . Between every two immiscible fluids, there are several variables to monitor the adsorption and desorption of the surfactant at the interface area as well as the diffusive movement .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conceptually, the obtained dynamic behavior of IFT is believed to be caused by the adsorption kinetics of interfacially active molecules (i.e., CTAB) at liquid interfaces, where the adsorption kinetics of CTAB molecules can be controlled by mass transfer phenomena from the bulk in the nanofluid phase into an adsorbed state or vice versa . Between every two immiscible fluids, there are several variables to monitor the adsorption and desorption of the surfactant at the interface area as well as the diffusive movement . Accordingly, it has been reported that the dynamic effect of the surfactant adsorption can be described by micellization equilibria and random sequential theory. , Conversely, other authors have proven that the reduction profile for the IFT, due to the presence of an active energy barrier, could be characterized by a simple exponential decay. , These models, even with simplicity, have failed in observing the mass transfer controlling mechanism, whether it is adsorption or diffusion, since both have been utilized loosely and interchangeably. , In detail, it has been reported that the controlling mechanism can be done during the transfer of surfactant molecules between the surface layer and the subsurface layer (adsorption) or it can be governed by the exchange of molecules between the subsurface and the bulk solution (diffusion along with occasional convection) .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, an interfacial layer with high viscoelasticity is known to be formed between the aqueous and lipophilic phases. It has a resistance to compression, hindering the external particles from moving into the oil phase (Jeon & Hong, 2014; Mahmoudvand et al., 2021). High IFT ow leads to a stronger interfacial layer, which is difficult to be broken up by eddy kinetic energy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, many other experimental works aimed at shedding light on mechanisms and conditions controlling the performance of the LSWF. Nonetheless, conventional experimental investigations imply that studies under laboratory conditions suffer from some issues including time and budget constraints, uncertainty in the quality of the data obtained and their reliability, the requirement of highly skilled personnel to design and conduct laboratory experiments, and some other common limitations of experimental research such as slight differences in standards and procedures. In recent years, owing to accumulation of a considerable amount of experimental data including coreflooding experiments in sandstone reservoirs, application of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) has attracted interest in petroleum engineering research ranging from EOR to flow assurance. As an example, AI-based models are used to estimate distribution of unwanted shale barriers in the SAGD procedure or provoke the acquisition of real-time water saturation from readily available well log data .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%