2009
DOI: 10.3851/imp1529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) inhibitors on the dynamics of CCR5 and CC-chemokine–CCR5 interactions

Abstract: The finding that APL moderately blocked the RANTES-triggered (YFP)CCR5 internalization despite the highly potent anti-HIV-1 activity of APL strongly suggests that development of CCR5 inhibitors, which do not overly inhibit physiological CC-chemokine-CCR5 interactions, is practically feasible.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As other groups have reported, maraviroc and other CCR5 antagonists inhibit the binding of the natural CCR5 ligands MIP-1a, MIP-1b, and RANTES to CCR5. 28,29 Because CCR5 receptor-ligand complexes are typically internalized by the cell after initial binding, the blockade of the receptor-ligand interaction prevents the internalization of both CCR5 and its ligands, resulting in an increase in CCR5 on the cell surface as well as an increase in circulating levels of CCR5 ligands, 28,29 as we observed in our trial. Presumably, this increase in CCR5 ligands would not have a physiological consequence on CCR5-mediated signaling because the increases in ligand are occurring as a consequence of CCR5 blockade.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As other groups have reported, maraviroc and other CCR5 antagonists inhibit the binding of the natural CCR5 ligands MIP-1a, MIP-1b, and RANTES to CCR5. 28,29 Because CCR5 receptor-ligand complexes are typically internalized by the cell after initial binding, the blockade of the receptor-ligand interaction prevents the internalization of both CCR5 and its ligands, resulting in an increase in CCR5 on the cell surface as well as an increase in circulating levels of CCR5 ligands, 28,29 as we observed in our trial. Presumably, this increase in CCR5 ligands would not have a physiological consequence on CCR5-mediated signaling because the increases in ligand are occurring as a consequence of CCR5 blockade.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Because CCR5 receptor-ligand complexes are typically internalized by the cell after binding, the blockade of the receptor-ligand interaction by maraviroc and other CCR5 inhibitors prevents the internalization of both CCR5 and its natural ligands, resulting in an increase in CCR5 on the cell surface as well as an increase in circulating CCR5 ligands. 28,29 Although increases in CCR5 ligands (MIP-1a, MIP-1b, and regulated on activation normal T expressed and secreted [RANTES]) are unlikely to affect signaling through CCR5 while maraviroc is bound, these ligands also bind other chemokine receptors including CCR3 and CCR4 on T cells, For personal use only. on May 7, 2018.…”
Section: Changes In T-cell Ccr5 Expression and Plasma Ccr5 Ligand Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drug concentrations that resulted in 50% reduction (IC 50 ) in p24 antigen production were determined. Antiviral assays using MAGI-CCR5 cells (MAGI assay) were conducted as previously reported 16 , 39 . Single-round virus infection assays using TZM-bl cells infected with R5-HIV-1s (HIV-1 YU2 , HIV-1 KP-5pc , and HIV-1 KP-5mvcR ) 10 were also conducted as previously described 25 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%