2017
DOI: 10.1177/1369433217706777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of central column aspect ratio on seismic performances of subway station structures

Abstract: The subway station structures have a contradiction in its design of the cross section of the central columns: larger aspect ratio increases the longitudinal traffic capacity, yet decreases the lateral seismic capacity. However, both capacities are important. Thus, finding a reasonable aspect ratio has become a significant problem to be studied in depth. In this article, a series of time history analyses are carried out on a typical two-story three-span subway station structure, and ultimate bearing capacity an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To be specific, the cross-sectional dimension of the central column was 400 mm × 400 mm, whilst the cross-sectional dimension of the floor was 3500 mm × 850 mm. According to the conclusion in [6], the station floor could be considered as a rigid body on the condition that the linear stiffness ratio of the station floor to the central column was more than 10. Thus, it was a reasonable assumption that the column bottom could be regarded as a fixed end.…”
Section: Specimen Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To be specific, the cross-sectional dimension of the central column was 400 mm × 400 mm, whilst the cross-sectional dimension of the floor was 3500 mm × 850 mm. According to the conclusion in [6], the station floor could be considered as a rigid body on the condition that the linear stiffness ratio of the station floor to the central column was more than 10. Thus, it was a reasonable assumption that the column bottom could be regarded as a fixed end.…”
Section: Specimen Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the hybrid simulation process, a quasi-static test is conducted to illustrate the mechanical properties of the central column after the earthquake excitation. main way to study the seismic performance of subway stations, especially for failure progress [3][4][5][6][7]. Such investigations give clues to the design of typical underground structures.Yasuo et al [3] used the equivalent linearized constitutive model for soil modeling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the damage status of the structure in these two cases is completely different. The horizontal deformation capacity of the structure has been demonstrated to be related to the axial compression ratio, 37 Chen 37,38 indicated that the high axial compression ratio of the center column has a significant adverse impact on the seismic performance of the underground structure, which means that only using the IDR to define the seismic performance for an underground structure is not entirely correct. Du 39 proposed a method based on developing load‐carrying capacity envelops that account for both the axial compression ratio and the horizontal deformation, which was successfully applied to assess the damage mechanism of the Daikai subway station.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural dynamic analysis is important to predict mechanical performance of structures in order to guarantee safety of the constructions when exposed to earthquakes (Chen and Liu, 2018; Chouw et al, 2006). To tackle the dynamic analysis, many implicit time integration methods were proposed and generally they show better accuracy and stability than some explicit algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%