2019
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00036.2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on the cognitive stage of sequence learning

Abstract: Though the cerebellum has been previously implicated in explicit sequence learning, the exact role of this structure in the acquisition of motor skills is not completely clear. The cerebellum contributes to both motor and nonmotor behavior. Thus, this structure not only may contribute to the motoric aspects of sequence learning but may also play a role in the cognitive components of these learning paradigms. Therefore, we investigated the consequence of both disrupting and facilitating cerebellar function usin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
28
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
9
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…cerebellar tDCS led to better knowledge of the sequence when compared to sham. The findings here are in accordance with previous work showing the beneficial effect of anodal cerebellar tDCS on motor sequence learning (Ferrucci et al, 2013;Shimizu et al, 2017) but in contrast to a recent report showing the opposite effect (Ballard et al, 2019). Note that in the latter study, a multi-channel montage was used with a net current of 2mA compared to our protocol with 1mA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…cerebellar tDCS led to better knowledge of the sequence when compared to sham. The findings here are in accordance with previous work showing the beneficial effect of anodal cerebellar tDCS on motor sequence learning (Ferrucci et al, 2013;Shimizu et al, 2017) but in contrast to a recent report showing the opposite effect (Ballard et al, 2019). Note that in the latter study, a multi-channel montage was used with a net current of 2mA compared to our protocol with 1mA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We used an explicit motor sequence learning paradigm, modeled directly after Kwak et al [49] and used in our past work [15], in order to assess the impact of DLPFC stimulation on the ability to acquire a motor skill and learn a new pattern of events. As research using fMRI has indicated more activation in brain areas associated with cognitive processing during explicit learning, compared to implicit [18,42,50,51], we chose to investigate the influence of stimulation with an explicit sequence learning paradigm to explore its effects on the cognitive, rather than solely motor, aspects of skill acquisition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, research suggests that the CBLM impacts cognitive processes through a closed-loop cerebello-thalamo-prefrontal circuit [9–14], which may be particularly important during initial skill acquisition. Notably, we have recently suggested that the PFC is the nexus of this circuit, governing the operations of early sequence learning, while the CBLM may serve more of a supporting role [15]. The PFC coordinates the cooperation of other brain areas involved in sequence learning [16] and is considerably engaged in the early stages of skill acquisition when cognitive and working memory resources are primarily at play [2,5,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grimaldi et al, (2016) suggests that anodal stimulation excites the inhibitory Purkinjie circuit which results in an increase in inhibitory function on the deep cerebellar nuclei (DCN) resulting in a decrease in cerebellar output, ultimately decreasing task performance. This is observed in behavioral work in humans as well (Ballard et al, 2019;Pope & Miall, 2012). Alternatively, it is believed that cathodal stimulation inhibits the inhibitory Purkinjie circuit which results in a decrease in inhibitory function on the DCN, resulting in an increase in cerebellar output, and ultimately increasing task performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Historically, the cerebellum was thought to be primarily involved in motor function (Holmes, 1939) and motor learning (Ballard et al, 2019;Bernard & Seidler, 2013). However, work over the last several decades has also implicated the cerebellum in non-motor cognitive processing (Buckner, 2013;Desmond et al, 1997;E et al, 2014;Leiner et al, 1989Leiner et al, , 1991Rapoport et al, 2000;Schmahmann, 2018;Schmahmann & Sherman, 1998;Stoodley, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%