Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2002.1039923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of channel delays on underflow events of compressed video over the Internet

Abstract: This paper presents an extensive statistical study and analysis of the effects of channel delays in the current (best-effort) Internet on underflow events in MPEG-4 video streaming. Two types of network delays are considered: end-to-end round-trip delays and delay jitter. Our data were collected in a seven-month real-time streaming experiment, which was conducted between a number of unicast dialup clients in more than 600 major U.S. cities and a backbone video server. Among other findings, our analysis shows t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our primary motivation for this work is recent applications by Fujimoto, Ata, and Murata (2001), Loguinov and Radha (2002), and Ding and Goubran (2003), in which Pareto distributions have been used to model network delays. We show thatθ BC emerges as the most attractive estimator when heavy-tailed distributions are added to the robustness study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our primary motivation for this work is recent applications by Fujimoto, Ata, and Murata (2001), Loguinov and Radha (2002), and Ding and Goubran (2003), in which Pareto distributions have been used to model network delays. We show thatθ BC emerges as the most attractive estimator when heavy-tailed distributions are added to the robustness study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deriving estimators for and will depend on the underlying models for the distribution of network delays. Several alternative distributions have been proposed, including exponential, gamma, lognormal, Weibull, and Pareto distributions (see, for example, Claffy et al [5], Mukherjee [6], Fujimoto et al [7], Loguinov and Radha [8], Bovy et al [9]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work in [41] investigated the BLUE and its corresponding bias-corrected estimator under a Pareto distribution: a heavy-tailed distribution that was adopted to model network delays for recent applications [42][43][44]. The authors in [41] examined the effectiveness of bootstrap bias correction of different estimators under varying assumptions for network delays.…”
Section: Bootstrap Bias Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%