2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019gl085706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Chemical Feedbacks on Decadal Methane Emissions Estimates

Abstract: The coupled chemistry of methane, carbon monoxide (CO), and hydroxyl radical (OH) can modulate methane's 9‐year lifetime. This is often ignored in methane flux inversions, and the impacts of neglecting interactive chemistry have not been quantified. Using a coupled‐chemistry box model, we show that neglecting the effect of methane source perturbation on [OH] can lead to a 25% bias in estimating abrupt changes in methane sources after only 10 years. Further, large CO emissions, such as from biomass burning, can… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…increase in OH primary production is mainly due to an increase in tropospheric water vapor and O3 burden during El Niño events ( Fig.S3 and S12 in Nicely et al (2020)), while the increase in OH secondary production is caused by enhanced NOx emissions (Fig.S3) and O3 formation (Nicely et al (2020) related to biomass burning as well as more HO2 formation by CO+OH. As a result, the OH year-to-year variations found here are much smaller than those estimated by Nguyen et al (2020), who mainly considered the response of OH to CO. The positive anomaly OH primary production (0.2±0.5Tmol yr -1 ) is not significant during 1991-1992 El Niño event, maybe due to reduction of tropospheric water vapor ( Fig.S3 in Nicely et al (2020)) after the eruption of Mount Pinatubo (Soden et al, 2020).…”
Section: Factors Controlling Oh Trends and Year-to-year Variabilitycontrasting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…increase in OH primary production is mainly due to an increase in tropospheric water vapor and O3 burden during El Niño events ( Fig.S3 and S12 in Nicely et al (2020)), while the increase in OH secondary production is caused by enhanced NOx emissions (Fig.S3) and O3 formation (Nicely et al (2020) related to biomass burning as well as more HO2 formation by CO+OH. As a result, the OH year-to-year variations found here are much smaller than those estimated by Nguyen et al (2020), who mainly considered the response of OH to CO. The positive anomaly OH primary production (0.2±0.5Tmol yr -1 ) is not significant during 1991-1992 El Niño event, maybe due to reduction of tropospheric water vapor ( Fig.S3 in Nicely et al (2020)) after the eruption of Mount Pinatubo (Soden et al, 2020).…”
Section: Factors Controlling Oh Trends and Year-to-year Variabilitycontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…The responses of OH to changes in biomass burning, ozone, water vapor, and lightning NOx emissions during El Niño years have been recognized by previous studies (Holmes et al, 2013;Murray et al, 2014;Turner et al, 2018;Rowlinson et al, 2019;Nguyen et al, 2020). Here, the consistent temporal variations of CCMI OH fields increase our confidence in the model simulated response of OH to ENSO as a result of several nonlinear chemical processes.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S1 in the Supplement). The CCMI models consistently simulated a positive OH trend during 2000-2010, mainly due to more OH production by NO than loss by CO over East and Southeast Asia and a positive trend of water vapor over the tropical regions (Zhao et al, 2019;Nicely et al, 2020). More details can be found in Zhao et al (2019) and the literature cited herein.…”
Section: Oh Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Based on satellite observations, Gauber et al (2017) estimated that ∼ 20 % decrease in atmospheric CO concentrations during 2002-2013 led to an ∼ 8 % increase in atmospheric [OH]. The El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) has been proven to impact the tropospheric OH burden and CH 4 lifetime mainly through changes in CO emissions from biomass burning (Nicely et al, 2020;Nguyen et al, 2020) and in NO emission from lightning (Murray et al, 2013;Turner et al, 2018). The ENSO signal is weak during the early 2000s, resulting in small interannual variations of tropospheric OH burden (Zhao et al, 2019).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%