2020
DOI: 10.3390/land9040127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of China’s Collective Forestland Tenure Reform Policies on Forest Product Firm Values

Abstract: China’s collective forestland tenure reform has dramatically affected the business environment of domestic forest product firms. This study examines the impact of the said reform on the expected values of these firms, via the reaction of investors (as seen on the stock markets) towards the issuance of related policies. Based on signaling theory and the assumption that the Chinese stock markets are efficient in terms of work form, this study adopts an event study method and examines five policies during the 200… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the analysis of forestry and the forest products industry, the event-study approach has largely been used to analyze the effects of changes in timberland (Sun and Zhang 2011;Sun et al 2013), industrial ownership (Mei and Sun 2008;Piao et al 2017), policy reforms, (Zhang and Binkley 1995;Niquidet 2008;Zhang et al 2020) or trading agreements (Malhotra and Gulati 2010).…”
Section: Event-study Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the analysis of forestry and the forest products industry, the event-study approach has largely been used to analyze the effects of changes in timberland (Sun and Zhang 2011;Sun et al 2013), industrial ownership (Mei and Sun 2008;Piao et al 2017), policy reforms, (Zhang and Binkley 1995;Niquidet 2008;Zhang et al 2020) or trading agreements (Malhotra and Gulati 2010).…”
Section: Event-study Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the implementation of the Household Responsibility System Land 2021, 10, 392 2 of 15 in farmland, the collective forest tenure began a large-scale reform, that is, the forestry "Three-fixed" reform, in 1981. However, the property right of this reform was uncertain and changeable, and this resulted in the lack of management rights of households [16]. In such circumstances, households carried on the massive cutting to the collective forest to pursue short-term economic benefits [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%