1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1988.tb01019.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Chlorhexidine Diacetate and Povidone‐lodine on Wound Healing in Dogs

Abstract: To correlate the results of an in vitro study with clinical response, the effects of 0.005 and 0.05% chlorhexidine diacetate and 0.1 and 1.0% povidone-iodine concentrations on wound healing were evaluated in five beagle dogs. Full-thickness skin wounds (2 X 2 cm) were irrigated once daily for 14 days with the antiseptic solutions or physiologic-buffered saline. Chlorhexidine diacetate 0.05% had significantly more bactericidal activity than povidone-iodine and saline, and both chlorhexidine diacetate concentrat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several inactivating reactive substances of the blood and serum may additionally reduce the substantivity of iodine. This might explain that albeit cytotoxic effects in vitro , wound healing in vivo is less affected [13]. In addition, reparative and regenerative periodontal processes are guided by the surrounding tissues, namely epithelium, connective tissue, periodontal ligament and bone which act as a source of growth factors and cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several inactivating reactive substances of the blood and serum may additionally reduce the substantivity of iodine. This might explain that albeit cytotoxic effects in vitro , wound healing in vivo is less affected [13]. In addition, reparative and regenerative periodontal processes are guided by the surrounding tissues, namely epithelium, connective tissue, periodontal ligament and bone which act as a source of growth factors and cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to that, the clinical use of CHX after oral surgical interventions, tooth extractions or implant placement showed significantly less signs of inflammation and improvement of gingival health by reduction of the microbial contamination of the wound [19][20][21]. A further disadvantage is given by the inactivation of CHX by binding on blood, serum proteins and sulcus fluid which was shown in in vitro studies [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In contrast to polyhexanide, povidone iodide, hydrogen peroxide and chlorhexidine do not lose full antiseptic activity in the presence of blood or other liquids [15,20]. Furthermore, treatment with 0.05 % chlorhexidine has no negative effects on wound healing [21,22]. When used in lavage, chlorhexidine 0.05 % eliminates 99.8 % of contaminating bacteria within one minute in a tissue model [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%