“…The reasons for difference in response are multifaceted and include physical features pertinent to electrochemotherapy, such as unavailability of the drug and insufficient coverage with electric field and biological, pertinent to patient, such as previous treatments, difference in tumor microenvironment, mutational status, and so on. 2,14,18 Thus, electrochemotherapy is still evaluated in different types of cancer, either in vitro or in vivo, including colon carcinoma CT26 (in vitro) 19 ; bladder cancer SW780 (in vitro and in vivo) 20 ; fibroblasts, human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC; in vitro) and two squamous cell carcinomas, CAL-27 and SCC-4 (in vitro) 21 ; ovarian cell lines OvBH-1 and SKOV-3 (in vitro) 22 ; human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells (in vitro) 23 ; BRAF-mutated melanoma cells (SK-MEL-28) and their counterpart without mutation, CHL-1 cells (in vitro) 24 ; chemoresistant uveal melanoma cells (Mel 270, 92-1, OMM-1, OMM-2) (in vitro) 25 ; primary cells from metastatic pancreatic tumors (in vitro) 26 ; human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma 2A3 (in vitro and in vivo) 27 ; Lewis lung carcinoma and CT 25 colorectal carcinoma (in vivo) 28 ; conjunctival melanoma CRMM1 and CRMM2 and normal conjunctival epithelial cells HCjE-Gi (in vitro) 29 ; radioresistant head and neck squamous cell carcinoma Fa-DuRR (in vitro and in vivo) 30 ; and small cell lung cancer H69AR cells (in vitro). 31 In general, it was demonstrated that electrochemotherapy with bleomycin or cisplatin causes immunogenic cell death in colon carcinoma 19,28 ; that human endothelial cells are more susceptible to electrochemotherapy than tumor cells, 21 supporting the antivascular effect in vivo; that electrochemotherapy is effective in ovarian carcinoma cells resistant to standard therapy 22 ; and that electrochemotherapy is also effective in neuroblastoma and primary pancreatic tumor cells, which was not demonstrated before.…”