2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-07814-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of cleaning procedures on the long-term corrosion behavior of bronze artifacts of the cultural heritage in outdoor environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three weeks after the treatment, a general increase in Rp values was measured, confirming the suitability and the effectiveness of the cleaning methodology and suggesting a general stabilisation and improvement of the protectiveness provided by the corrosion layers left on the surface. The few data available in literature regarding the corrosion behaviour of surfaces after cleaning generally report a moderate decrease of Rp immediately after cleaning, suggesting a temporary reactivation of the surfaces [11,34,35]. In the present case, the electrochemical measurements were not performed immediately after cleaning, and probably the 3 weeks elapsed between the cleaning and the Rp analysis allowed achieving a stabilisation of the patina higher than before the intervention.…”
Section: Type Of Cloth or Sponge For Lpr And Eis Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Three weeks after the treatment, a general increase in Rp values was measured, confirming the suitability and the effectiveness of the cleaning methodology and suggesting a general stabilisation and improvement of the protectiveness provided by the corrosion layers left on the surface. The few data available in literature regarding the corrosion behaviour of surfaces after cleaning generally report a moderate decrease of Rp immediately after cleaning, suggesting a temporary reactivation of the surfaces [11,34,35]. In the present case, the electrochemical measurements were not performed immediately after cleaning, and probably the 3 weeks elapsed between the cleaning and the Rp analysis allowed achieving a stabilisation of the patina higher than before the intervention.…”
Section: Type Of Cloth or Sponge For Lpr And Eis Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Based on the Sku kurtosis parameter, it was observed which abrasives give a beneficial effect in the cleaning process. In References [ 9 , 30 ], it is recommended that height parameters should be considered together with kurtosis, because not only the depth of the surface profile recesses but also their shape determines the concentration of stress.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High financial outlays, required to protect metals against corrosion, are the result of a number of activities thanks to which corrosion processes are stopped or, to a significant extent, delayed. References [ 28 , 29 , 30 ] present the problem of cleaning machine parts and methods of their protection. At last, the sources of corrosion processes and corrosion prevention methods were evaluated in References [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This treatment uses specific, tunable laser parameters such as wavelength, as well as pulse frequency and duration, to preferentially excite and safely remove undesired coatings or contaminants from a surface through photomechanical, photothermal, and photochemical reactions [3]. Among its successful applications, laser cleaning has proven highly effective for removing corrosion products from bronze sculptures [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] and archaeological objects [10][11][12][13]. One of the main advantages of this cleaning methodology is the possibility to select suitable settings for achieving the expected results, preventing the operator from damaging the artwork [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%