2000
DOI: 10.1139/x00-102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of clear-cutting on decomposition rates of litter and forest floor in forests of British Columbia

Abstract: The rate of mass loss of three standard substrates (pine needle litter, aspen leaf litter, and forest floor material) was measured in forests and adjacent clearcuts at 21 sites throughout British Columbia, to test the hypotheses that (i) rates of mass loss are greater in clearcuts than in forests and (ii) clear-cutting would stimulate decomposition most in colder zones. Mass loss ranged from 53 to 75% after four years in pine needles, 49 to 70% after 3 years in aspen leaves, and 11 to 20% after 4 years in fore… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
1
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
30
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Collectively, these impacts suggest substantial alteration of carbon cycling in the soil, particularly the organic layer, for many years following forest harvesting. Litter bag decomposition experiments have yielded mixed results (Prescott, 2005), with some showing reduced decomposition rates and enzymatic activities because of forest harvesting (Prescott et al, 2000;Waldrop et al, 2003). However, litter bag experiments have not shown such long-term effects as the present study that is the first to provide evidence that, for at least 12 years after harvesting a forest, the genetic potential for biomass decomposition was diminished in the soil community.…”
Section: Forest Harvesting Has Long-term Effects On Biodegradation Pocontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Collectively, these impacts suggest substantial alteration of carbon cycling in the soil, particularly the organic layer, for many years following forest harvesting. Litter bag decomposition experiments have yielded mixed results (Prescott, 2005), with some showing reduced decomposition rates and enzymatic activities because of forest harvesting (Prescott et al, 2000;Waldrop et al, 2003). However, litter bag experiments have not shown such long-term effects as the present study that is the first to provide evidence that, for at least 12 years after harvesting a forest, the genetic potential for biomass decomposition was diminished in the soil community.…”
Section: Forest Harvesting Has Long-term Effects On Biodegradation Pocontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Indeed, ground skidding has probably partially buried the forest floor into the mineral soil (Yanai et al, 2003) and the changes in ground climate resulting from canopy opening possibly accelerated litter decomposition (Prescott et al, 2000). The forest floor plays a major role in P nutrition (Jonard et al, submitted).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In accordance with this, most LTSP Study sites so far lack detectable effects of harvesting treatments on tree regeneration or soil properties (Conlin and Driessche, 2000;Powers et al, 2005Powers et al, , 2012. Timberharvesting effects on hemicellulose degradation have never been directly investigated, but litter decomposition has previously been reported to be unaffected by harvesting in the IDF and sub-boreal spruce ecozones (Prescott et al, 2000). However, tree regeneration at these sites is in an early phase, and as the trees grow, changing factors will limit that growth.…”
Section: Harvesting Impacts On Hemicellulolytic Microbes Htc Leung Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%