2023
DOI: 10.1002/agj2.21479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of climatic factors on carbohydrate composition of soybeans in Argentina

Carla Georgina Marioli Nobile,
Mónica Balzarini,
Rubén Grosso
et al.

Abstract: Carbohydrates are the second largest component of soybean seeds and include soluble sugars, a major source of energy. However, some oligosaccharides such as the raffinose family (RFOs) are considered antinutritional factors. In Argentina, the soybean crop area shows high climatic variation during the seed filling period (R5‐R7), affecting seed composition. The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of climatic traits on carbohydrate (CHO) composition of non‐transgenic soybean seeds of different cult… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained from the variance component analysis of the agronomic features and grain composition of chickpea seeds showed statistically significant ( p < 0.001) differences of G, E, and G × E interaction effects (Table 5). The high environmental variability was confirmed by ANOVA components, which showed that although genotype, environment, and G × E interaction were significant ( p < 0.001) for all traits, environment was the most important source of variation for most of them, which is common in MET (Marioli Nobile et al., 2023).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The results obtained from the variance component analysis of the agronomic features and grain composition of chickpea seeds showed statistically significant ( p < 0.001) differences of G, E, and G × E interaction effects (Table 5). The high environmental variability was confirmed by ANOVA components, which showed that although genotype, environment, and G × E interaction were significant ( p < 0.001) for all traits, environment was the most important source of variation for most of them, which is common in MET (Marioli Nobile et al., 2023).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%