High Temperature Alloys for Gas Turbines 1982 1982
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-7907-9_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Cobalt in Nickel-Base Superalloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By remaining in contact with the c channel, the supply of Cr and Co to the expanding SESF may be facilitated as Cr and Co preferentially partition to the c phase. [33][34][35][36] Other sources of excess Cr and Co could include nano-precipitates of c in the c¢.…”
Section: B Stacking Fault Shearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By remaining in contact with the c channel, the supply of Cr and Co to the expanding SESF may be facilitated as Cr and Co preferentially partition to the c phase. [33][34][35][36] Other sources of excess Cr and Co could include nano-precipitates of c in the c¢.…”
Section: B Stacking Fault Shearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, work was conducted to determine a minimum Co content for achieving the required creep strain behavior and a T solvus value below 1165°C. A minimum Co content was sought to reduce the propensity for r formation [28], to promote improved resistance to type II hot corrosion damage since the melting temperature of Na 2 SO 4 -CoSO 4 eutectic is 565°C [29], compared to Na 2 SO 4 -NiSO 4 , which melts at 671°C [30], and to minimize raw material costs. The benefits of Co in lowering the stacking fault energy [28,31] and in producing more annealing twins are well documented [32].…”
Section: Alloy Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A minimum Co content was sought to reduce the propensity for r formation [28], to promote improved resistance to type II hot corrosion damage since the melting temperature of Na 2 SO 4 -CoSO 4 eutectic is 565°C [29], compared to Na 2 SO 4 -NiSO 4 , which melts at 671°C [30], and to minimize raw material costs. The benefits of Co in lowering the stacking fault energy [28,31] and in producing more annealing twins are well documented [32]. The latter reduces effective grain size, which is important for fatigue crack nucleation life for coarse grain microstructures at temperatures below 650°C.…”
Section: Alloy Designmentioning
confidence: 99%