“…It was clear that compared to those of the 20Co 3 O 4 /γ-MA sample, the total peak areas of H 2 consumptions associated with Co 3 O 4 crystallites, surface Co 3+ ions, and Co 3+ –Al 3+ oxide crystallites exhibited an obvious increase, whereas the one due to the Co δ Al (8/3–2/3δ) O 4 spinel had a significant decline. It should be noted that TPR peak locations of supported Co oxide species showed a high complexity due to the interaction between Co species and support, which have a close relation with the nature of support, preparation method, particle size, Co content, calcination conditions, and reduction gas composition; therefore, several interpretations for the Co oxide species supported on alumina in the published literature have still been ambiguous and even sometimes contradictory to date. − …”