2022
DOI: 10.3390/en15020655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Cofiring Coal and Biomass Fuel on the Pulverized Coal Injection Combustion Zone in Blast Furnaces

Abstract: CO2 emissions are a major contributor to global warming. Biomass combustion is one approach to tackling this issue. Biomass is used with coal combustion in thermal power plants or with blast furnaces (BFs) because it is a carbon-neutral fuel; therefore, biomass provides the advantage of reduced CO2 emissions. To examine the effect of co-firing on pulverized coal injection (PCI) in BFs, two coals of different ranks were blended with the biomass in different proportions, and then their combustion behaviors were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are shown in Figure 7. When the woodchip percentage increasing, the amount of CO2 decreased due to the effect of volatile combustion [7], and the amount of volatile components in biomass structure was higher than coal [6]. The amount of SOx has in the same trend as the amount of CO2 because the sulfur component in the woodchip is lower than coal.…”
Section: Effect Of Biomass To Coal Feeding Ratiomentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results are shown in Figure 7. When the woodchip percentage increasing, the amount of CO2 decreased due to the effect of volatile combustion [7], and the amount of volatile components in biomass structure was higher than coal [6]. The amount of SOx has in the same trend as the amount of CO2 because the sulfur component in the woodchip is lower than coal.…”
Section: Effect Of Biomass To Coal Feeding Ratiomentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For the multiphase interaction, the drag model used in this study is the Gidaspow drag model, as shown in equation (5), combines Wen and Yu for the dilute phase behavior and the Ergun drag model for the dense phase behaviour [ 14] . The heat transfer between the granular and gas phases is calculated using the Gunn model, as shown in the equation (7), to determine the Nusselt number for interphase heat transfer between gas-solid fuel and gas-sand [17].…”
Section: Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same time, the content of fractions of ground L1 that passed through the 1 mm and 90 μm sieves is 100% and 26.5%, while this con-tent for fractions of waste woody biomass is 98.9% and 5%, respectively. For this reason, the CO emission increases with the increase in the proportion of biomass in the mixture with L1 -see also [20], [23], [25]- [27]. This phenomenon is linked to a higher proportion of volatiles in both types of biomass.…”
Section: A Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The efficiency of the combustion process of various solid fuels, including the level of emission of undesirable and harmful components of flue gases into the environment, depends on a number of factors, the key ones being: type and properties of fuel, mechanical preparation of fuel, coefficient of excess air and the method of supplying that air to the reaction zone and combustion temperature. Therefore, there is still a very pronounced lack of even basic knowledge about the combustion characteristics of different fuels in different process settings (Sami, Annamalai & Wooldridge 2001, Demirbas 2004, Yuan et al 2021, Kim et al 2022. This deficiency is particularly pronounced for low-value, low reactivity, high-ash and solid fuels prone to soiling of heating surfaces and their mixtures (Kurose, Ikeda & Makino 2001, Zevenhoven et al 2012, Hurskainen & Vainikka 2016, Jenkins 2020.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%