2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of combined natural volcanic powders on the thermo-physical and mechanical properties of structural eco-concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantage of the results of the compressive strength at 28 days and at 90 days is in favor of the sand concretes with mineral powder (D) for 5%, 10% and 15% compared to the sand concretes with 5%, 10% and 15% of the mineral powders (A, B and C) used separated. This observation confirms the advantage of several types of research on the use of both mineral powders [14][15][16]36] , and the use of three mineral powders [10,37] . For example, the test results showed that the addition of limestone filler, blast furnace slag, and natural pozzolan, incorporated simultaneously in cement improves the mechanical behavior of limestone mortars [37] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The advantage of the results of the compressive strength at 28 days and at 90 days is in favor of the sand concretes with mineral powder (D) for 5%, 10% and 15% compared to the sand concretes with 5%, 10% and 15% of the mineral powders (A, B and C) used separated. This observation confirms the advantage of several types of research on the use of both mineral powders [14][15][16]36] , and the use of three mineral powders [10,37] . For example, the test results showed that the addition of limestone filler, blast furnace slag, and natural pozzolan, incorporated simultaneously in cement improves the mechanical behavior of limestone mortars [37] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The third one is the partial substitution of artificial Portland cement or Portland cement compound by other mineral powders. In this context, Itim et al used limestone, pozzolan separated with different percentages [12] ; Burgos-Montes et al substituted a part of cement by limestone, fly ash and silica fume [13] ; Dif et al used combined natural volcanic powders: pozzolan and perlite [14] ; Zaitri et al used dune sand powder and limestone [15,16] ; Deepankar used silica fume, and metakaolin [17] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason is that BP is usually inert admixtures, which only plays a filling role in concrete and does not have pozzolanic activity with less contribution of the development of compressive strength. By contrast, the traditional mineral admixtures, FA and GGBS, can not only play a filling effect but also have certain pozzolanic activity, which can react with cement hydration products for secondary hydration, further compact concrete and improve the compressive strength of concrete [1][2][3]. In general, adding BP to prepare concrete sample will put an adverse effect on compressive strength of concrete, and it can be foreseen that when recycling BP to replace cement mass, the dosage of BP should be limited.…”
Section: Admixture Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eco-mortar provides an alternative to traditional mortar, which typically includes cement, sand, and water. In addition to being eco-friendly, eco-mortar offers several other benefits [1]. For instance, it is more resistant to cracking and shrinking than traditional mortar and provides better insulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%