2013
DOI: 10.14746/ssllt.2013.3.2.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of communication strategy training on EFL students’ performance in small-group discussions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter lays emphasis on the mental processes that learners engage in when they experience a language deficit, with the effect that the focus is primarily on compensatory devices, the classifications are thus much more parsimonious and the value of instruction in CSs is denied in line with the belief that such strategies can be transferred from the L1. These two approaches have triggered a spate of research projects, mainly in the 1980s and 1990s, that have aimed, among other things, to identify and describe the CSs used in different situations (e.g., Nakahama, Tyler, & van Lier, 2001), to gauge factors mediating their employment, such as proficiency, task type, cognitive style or willingness to communicate (e.g., Hsieh, 2014;Littlemore, 2001;Mesgarshahr & Abdollahzadeh, 2014;Pawlak, 2009), and to look into the effects of instruction targeting CSs (e.g., Benson, Fischer, Geluso, & Joo, 2013;Nakatani, 2005;Pawlak, 2005;Teng, 2012).…”
Section: Overview Of Previous Research On Speaking Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter lays emphasis on the mental processes that learners engage in when they experience a language deficit, with the effect that the focus is primarily on compensatory devices, the classifications are thus much more parsimonious and the value of instruction in CSs is denied in line with the belief that such strategies can be transferred from the L1. These two approaches have triggered a spate of research projects, mainly in the 1980s and 1990s, that have aimed, among other things, to identify and describe the CSs used in different situations (e.g., Nakahama, Tyler, & van Lier, 2001), to gauge factors mediating their employment, such as proficiency, task type, cognitive style or willingness to communicate (e.g., Hsieh, 2014;Littlemore, 2001;Mesgarshahr & Abdollahzadeh, 2014;Pawlak, 2009), and to look into the effects of instruction targeting CSs (e.g., Benson, Fischer, Geluso, & Joo, 2013;Nakatani, 2005;Pawlak, 2005;Teng, 2012).…”
Section: Overview Of Previous Research On Speaking Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of language is emphasized in social interaction activities (Huang, 2016). Conversation and discussion exercises, dialogue, role acting, interviews, information gaps, games, language exchanges, surveys, and pair work, are just a few samples (Benson et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In L2, this corresponds to negotiation of meaning in Nakatani (2006Nakatani ( , 2010 and Naughton (2006), to interacting strategies in Celce-Murcia (2008), and to paraphrasing and seeking information or an opinion in Bejarano et al (1997). Studies have shown that clarification plays an important role in the negotiation of meaning during L2 conversation (Benson, Fischer, Geluso, & Von Joo, 2013;Nakahama, Tyler & Lier, 2001;Nakatani, 2010;Pica, 1994). In L1, it is quite often that, in order to make one's own views more convincible, one will give explanations, examples or reasons, but from a non-linguistic perspective (Zhu, 2014b;O'Sullivan, Weir & Saville, 2002).…”
Section: The Oral Interaction Strategy Scale (Oiss)mentioning
confidence: 99%