2010
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.044818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of competitive prey capture on flight behavior and sonar beam pattern in paired big brown bats,Eptesicus fuscus

Abstract: SUMMARYSupplementary material available online at

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
38
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, the falcons in our previous study (Kane and Zamani, 2014) flew through the unobstructed sky, so viewing the prey at a lateral angle was unproblematic. As both species frequently fixed prey at nonzero visual angles, this supports the hypothesis that these birds may collide with man-made objects because they often focus attention away from their forward direction (Lima et al, 2014;Martin et al, 2012).Other taxa have been found to use different pursuit-evasion strategies for different scenarios, including flies (Land, 1993), fiddler crabs (Land and Layne, 1995) and bats (Chiu et al, 2010; Ghose et al, 2006). Consequently, we caution that these findings for goshawks and falcons need not apply in every circumstance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By contrast, the falcons in our previous study (Kane and Zamani, 2014) flew through the unobstructed sky, so viewing the prey at a lateral angle was unproblematic. As both species frequently fixed prey at nonzero visual angles, this supports the hypothesis that these birds may collide with man-made objects because they often focus attention away from their forward direction (Lima et al, 2014;Martin et al, 2012).Other taxa have been found to use different pursuit-evasion strategies for different scenarios, including flies (Land, 1993), fiddler crabs (Land and Layne, 1995) and bats (Chiu et al, 2010; Ghose et al, 2006). Consequently, we caution that these findings for goshawks and falcons need not apply in every circumstance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…2B). CP has been observed for bees (Zhang et al, 1990), flies (Land, 1993;Trischler et al, 2010), beetles (Gilbert, 1997) and bats following conspecifics (Chiu et al, 2010) and chasing slow prey (Kalko and Schnitzler, 1998).…”
Section: Pursuit-evasion In Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies suggested that bats deal with jamming by shifting their echolocation frequency (i.e. jamming avoidance [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]). This strategy has been shown in electric fish [15] and should reduce masking by partitioning the frequency range between the individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative assessment of architecture of collective behaviour demands detailed analysis of trajectory data gathered in the field or laboratory, including statistical comparison of individual trajectory properties (such as curvatures) against feedback control laws of the type discussed in this paper (as in §3). With regard to two-agent interactions, we note previous work [13][14][15] on prey capture behaviour of echolocating bats as illustrative. In a recent study of flocks of starlings [16], and in the work on hierarchical structures in flight behaviour of flocks of (homing) pigeons [17], broad graph structural properties are inferred using statistical analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%