2007
DOI: 10.1159/000103211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Computer-Assisted Speech Training on Mandarin-Speaking Hearing-Impaired Children

Abstract: The present study investigated whether moderate amounts of computer-assisted speech training can improve the speech recognition performance of hearing-impaired children. Ten Mandarin-speaking children (3 hearing aid users and 7 cochlear implant users) participated in the study. Training was conducted at home using a personal computer for half an hour per day, 5 days per week, for a period of 10 weeks. Results showed significant improvements in subjects’ vowel, consonant, and tone recognition performance after … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
62
2
9

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
7
62
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The advent of relatively inexpensive personal computers has made it possible to automate many common training routines, making computerized training a practical, low-cost approach for improving patient auditory perception (Henshaw & Ferguson, 2013;Pizarek, Shafiro, & McCarthy, 2013). A number of training programs, targeting different aspects of auditory perception and cognitive processing, have been tested with CI patients (Dawson & Clark, 1997;Fu & Galvin, 2007;Gfeller, Witt, Kim, Adamek, & Coffman, 1999;Goldsworthy & Shannon, 2014;Ingvalson, Lee, Fiebig, & Wong, 2013;Miller, Watson, Kistler, Wightman, & Preminger, 2008;Oba, Fu, & Galvin, 2011;Stacey et al, 2010;Wu, Yang, Lin, & Fu, 2007;Zhang, Dorman, Fu, & Spahr, 2012). Training studies with CI patients differ considerably in terms of study design, training regimens, materials, and outcome measures.…”
Section: Computerized Training In Cochlear Implant Rehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advent of relatively inexpensive personal computers has made it possible to automate many common training routines, making computerized training a practical, low-cost approach for improving patient auditory perception (Henshaw & Ferguson, 2013;Pizarek, Shafiro, & McCarthy, 2013). A number of training programs, targeting different aspects of auditory perception and cognitive processing, have been tested with CI patients (Dawson & Clark, 1997;Fu & Galvin, 2007;Gfeller, Witt, Kim, Adamek, & Coffman, 1999;Goldsworthy & Shannon, 2014;Ingvalson, Lee, Fiebig, & Wong, 2013;Miller, Watson, Kistler, Wightman, & Preminger, 2008;Oba, Fu, & Galvin, 2011;Stacey et al, 2010;Wu, Yang, Lin, & Fu, 2007;Zhang, Dorman, Fu, & Spahr, 2012). Training studies with CI patients differ considerably in terms of study design, training regimens, materials, and outcome measures.…”
Section: Computerized Training In Cochlear Implant Rehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also recently studied the effect of targeted phonetic contrast training on Mandarin-speaking CI users' Chinese speech performance (Wu et al, 2007). In tonal languages such as Mandarin Chinese, the tonality of a syllable is lexically important (Lin, 1988;Wang, 1989).…”
Section: Targeted Speech Contrast Training In Quietmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These cues are generally weaker than F 0 , and CI users may require targeted training to attend to these cues. Wu et al (2007) studied the effect of moderate auditory training on Chinese speech perception in 10 hearing-impaired Mandarin-speaking pediatric subjects (7 CI users and 3 HA users). After measuring baseline Chinese vowel, consonant and tone recognition, subjects trained at home using the CAST program.…”
Section: Targeted Speech Contrast Training In Quietmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research evidence is available only for the efficacy of speech perception intervention with adults and school-aged children. Although these intervention studies reported positive outcomes [39][40][41][42], their applicability to preschool children is limited because all of these programmes require participants to have prior linguistic and letter-to-sound knowledge in addition to being literate. Moreover, the programmes tracked the development of speech perception skills without measuring the development of other aspects of verbal communication skills such as vocabulary development and speech intelligibility, thereby failing to demonstrate any improvement in functional skills as a result of improved speech perception or auditory development.…”
Section: The Importance Of Early Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%