1978
DOI: 10.1002/tea.3660150604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of computer simulated or laboratory experiments and student aptitude on achievement and time in a college general chemistry laboratory course

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cavin and Lagowski found no significant differences in scores on a practical lab exam between a group of students who used a computer simulation of a spectrophotometer and a group who practiced with the instrument in the lab. They attributed this to the success of computer instruction in teaching students how to perform important procedural steps (54 ).…”
Section: The Pre-laboratory Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cavin and Lagowski found no significant differences in scores on a practical lab exam between a group of students who used a computer simulation of a spectrophotometer and a group who practiced with the instrument in the lab. They attributed this to the success of computer instruction in teaching students how to perform important procedural steps (54 ).…”
Section: The Pre-laboratory Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…variables influence the success of CAI, it is safe to assume that the type of CAI used, as well as the subject matter of investigation, will affect the outcome of CAI research (Bear, 1984;Dence, 1980). In looking specifically at studies in which CAI has been used in chemistry education, some research showed that CAI served to enhance achievement (e.g., Boblick, 1972;Castleberry, Culp, & Lagowski, 1973;Cavin & Lagowski, 1978;Culp & Castleberry, 1971;Geban, ASkar, & Ozkan, 1992). Contradictory evidence about the effectiveness of CAI also exists.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%