2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-4488(02)00007-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of concentrates with different contents of protected fat rich in PUFAs on the performance lactating Granadina goats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
21
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
8
21
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…At 180 days in milk, the goats receiving CSFA produced nearly 3.0 kg of milk/day versus 2.0 kg/day for the control diet. These results contradict Sanz Sampelayo et al (2002b), who observed no effect on milk yield in CSFA-supplemented animals, and differ from Hosam (2011), who showed that milk yield increased only with diets containing the highest CSFA levels.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At 180 days in milk, the goats receiving CSFA produced nearly 3.0 kg of milk/day versus 2.0 kg/day for the control diet. These results contradict Sanz Sampelayo et al (2002b), who observed no effect on milk yield in CSFA-supplemented animals, and differ from Hosam (2011), who showed that milk yield increased only with diets containing the highest CSFA levels.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Sanz Sampelayo et al (2002a) reported feed refusal by goats fed concentrate plus CSFA, with a negative impact on DMI. However, this problem was not encountered in the present study, nor was it observed by Teh et al (1994), who fed higher levels of CSFA (90 g/kg DM of diet) to goats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To our knowledge, only AbuGhazaleh et al (2002) reported no changes in ECM of dairy cows supplemented with different fat sources or their blends. Sampelayo et al (2002a) showed no effect on energy yield in the milk due to fat supplementation by either 9 or 12% protected fat rich in PUFA which agrees with our result.…”
Section: Milk Production and Compositionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This might explain the reduced dry matter intake observed with the 5%SBO. DMI tended to decrease as fat level in the diet increased due to physiological regulation mechanism of feed intake in terms of increased energy density with rising level of fat the diet (Sampelayo et al, 2002b). The same reference pointed that the decrease in feed intake was also due to decreased palatability of the diets with oil supplementation.…”
Section: Dry Matter Intake Body Weights and Blood Metabolitesmentioning
confidence: 92%