2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of conformational entropy on antiwear performances of organic friction modifiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The statistical results of the final adsorption amount of different concentrations of SDS were larger than that of the AOT solutions at all concentrations (Figure 8b), and the dissipations were all less than 2.0 × 10 −6 . The result was reasonable, because the molecular structure of SDS is a single straight chain, while that of AOT is a double-branched chain, such that SDS can be arranged more densely than AOT on the Al 2 O 3 sensor of QCM [7,44]. The peak value in the adsorbed amount curve of 15 mM SDS (Figure 8a) was due to the fact that SDS reached the surface of the Al 2 O 3 sensor in the form of micelles and then underwent a transition of arrangement structure upon adsorption, and the difference in the arrangement structures of different concentrations of SDS solutions on the surface was probably the reason for their different adsorption amount.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The statistical results of the final adsorption amount of different concentrations of SDS were larger than that of the AOT solutions at all concentrations (Figure 8b), and the dissipations were all less than 2.0 × 10 −6 . The result was reasonable, because the molecular structure of SDS is a single straight chain, while that of AOT is a double-branched chain, such that SDS can be arranged more densely than AOT on the Al 2 O 3 sensor of QCM [7,44]. The peak value in the adsorbed amount curve of 15 mM SDS (Figure 8a) was due to the fact that SDS reached the surface of the Al 2 O 3 sensor in the form of micelles and then underwent a transition of arrangement structure upon adsorption, and the difference in the arrangement structures of different concentrations of SDS solutions on the surface was probably the reason for their different adsorption amount.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…There are two possible reasons. Firstly, the boundary film of SDS was denser (Figure 8), which meant that it could achieve a better anti-friction effect [44]. Secondly, some parts of the contact zones were very limited in space, with only one or a few molecular diameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy consumption owing to friction accounts for 23%, approximately 119 EJ, of global energy consumption [1,2]. In present industrialized nations, financial wastage brought by friction and wear is as high as about 6% of GDP [1,3]. In order to protect the environment and reduce economic loss, frictional energy losses and wear should be minimized [4][5][6], which requires higher energy efficiency of mechanical system [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an important class of lubricant additives, OFMs are typical amphiphilic surfactant molecules with non-polar aliphatic tail groups and polar head groups [3,8,10,12,14,15]. The polar head groups can adsorb on the substrate surface, and long aliphatic tail groups align outward into the lubricating oil, forming close-packed self-assembled monolayers [14,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation