2015
DOI: 10.1017/s1751731114002699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of conjugated linoleic acid or betaine on the growth performance and fatty acid composition in backfat and belly fat of finishing pigs fed dried distillers grains with solubles

Abstract: The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) or betaine on the growth performance, carcass characteristics and fatty acid composition in backfat and belly fat of pigs fed distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS). Thirty-two (60 ± 2 kg) crossbred barrows (Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshine) were assigned to one of four diets randomly: (1) the control diet containing no corn DDGS (control group); (2) the diet containing 30% corn DDGS (DDGS-fed group); (3) the diet co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
9
2
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
9
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The information obtained is consistent with the results found by Feng et al (2006) in which the group receiving betaine (1.25 mg/kg) presen-ted a consumption of 2.39 vs. 2.34 the control group (P>0.05). Similar to these results were those found by Wang et al (2015) in which pigs fed with DDGs at 30 % and received betaine (0.1 %) showed a consumption of 2.65 vs. 2.71 kg/day of the control group (without DDGs or betaine). They also coincide with those found in the study carried out by Schrama et al (2003) in which was assessed the inclusion of betaine at a level of 1.29 g/kg of food (0.129 %) with no significant difference (P>0.10) 1.548 kg vs. 1.558 kg for the control and experimental group, respectively, over a three-week period of experimentation, although this study was carried out in pigs between 35 to 46 kg of live weight.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The information obtained is consistent with the results found by Feng et al (2006) in which the group receiving betaine (1.25 mg/kg) presen-ted a consumption of 2.39 vs. 2.34 the control group (P>0.05). Similar to these results were those found by Wang et al (2015) in which pigs fed with DDGs at 30 % and received betaine (0.1 %) showed a consumption of 2.65 vs. 2.71 kg/day of the control group (without DDGs or betaine). They also coincide with those found in the study carried out by Schrama et al (2003) in which was assessed the inclusion of betaine at a level of 1.29 g/kg of food (0.129 %) with no significant difference (P>0.10) 1.548 kg vs. 1.558 kg for the control and experimental group, respectively, over a three-week period of experimentation, although this study was carried out in pigs between 35 to 46 kg of live weight.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, these data differ from those obtained in pigs between 62.5 to 92.5 kg of live weight, in which there was no significant difference (P>0.05) 0.715 kg/d and 0.748 kg/d for the control group and betaine (1.25 mg/kg), respectively (Feng et al, 2006). Similarly, in the study carried out by Wang et al (2015) in pigs between 58 to 94 kg there was no significant difference (P>0.05) between the group receiving betaine (0.1 %) and the control 0.85 vs. 0.87, respectively. A similar trend to the studies of Feng et al (2006); Wang et al (2015) was found when betaine was used at an inclusion level of 0.129 % in pigs between 35 to 46 kg, being the GDP of 0.651 for the experimental group and 0.648 for the control group (Schrama et al, 2003).…”
Section: Daily Weight Gain (Gdp)contrasting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations