2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of context and individual differences on the processing of taboo words

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Switching from the non-dominant English to the dominant Spanish representation in these relatively dominant Spanish speakers appears to engage the emotional processing resources supported by the amygdala. (Note that early effects of valence on lexical processing have also been reported for monolinguals [ 70 72 ].) Interestingly, the lateralized switch effect in hippocampus and the L1-to-L2 amygdala effects are compatible with those reported by Hernandez [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Switching from the non-dominant English to the dominant Spanish representation in these relatively dominant Spanish speakers appears to engage the emotional processing resources supported by the amygdala. (Note that early effects of valence on lexical processing have also been reported for monolinguals [ 70 72 ].) Interestingly, the lateralized switch effect in hippocampus and the L1-to-L2 amygdala effects are compatible with those reported by Hernandez [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…While the previous studies were conducted in a formal context (a university lab, at the presence of a senior experimenter), the current experiments were run in an informal one (online at participants' home, with no contact with the experimenter). As the effects of taboo connotation are highly sensitive to the context (e.g., Christianson et al, 2017;MacKay et al, 2004MacKay et al, , 2015, this may have reduced the impact of taboo connotation, particularly for pseudowords, in which the access to the taboo connotation is mediated by the activation of their base-word. In addition, the effect of taboo interference-but not the Simon and the Semantic Stroop effect-was subject to habituation, being maximal at the beginning of the experiment and disappearing later on.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…eye trackers) has been used for expressional anomie research. Christianson et al (2017) examined individual differences in the extent to which readers were offended by taboo words via eye-tracking experiments, and introduced a new theory for taboo word processing. Meanwhile, artificial intelligence technologies are applied to detect expressional anomie.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%