1979
DOI: 10.3109/00952997909001724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Contingent Payment on Compliance with a Naltrexone Regimen

Abstract: The effects of several schedules of payment on duration and patterns of compliance with a naltrexone regimen were examined. Patients were paid under contingencies based on either number of doses ingested or on a fixed time schedule. Reinforcement schedules based on number of doses ingested produced more consistent treatment-oriented behavior than a time-based schedule. Covariation between behavior and alternating contingencies (A-B-A) indicated that the schedules contributed to increased duration of treatment … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fifteen studies were excluded as they were not randomised,14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 eight studies were excluded because the trials compared the effect of different types of financial incentives without a control group as comparator,29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 and two studies provided insufficient data for contingency tables to be developed 37 38…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifteen studies were excluded as they were not randomised,14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 eight studies were excluded because the trials compared the effect of different types of financial incentives without a control group as comparator,29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 and two studies provided insufficient data for contingency tables to be developed 37 38…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite its potential advantages, its impact on the practical treatment of opioid dependence in the U.S. has been low due to poor compliance (Rounsaville, 1995). Many efforts have been made to increase compliance including rewards for drug-free urines (Grabowski, 1979;Meyer, Mirin, & Zackow, 1979); combining it with psychosocial treatments such as behavior therapy (Callahan et al, 1980), individual counseling (Resnick, Schuyten-Resnick, & Washton, 1979) or family therapy (Anton & Hogan, 1981); or using it in the context of legal pressure (Cornish et al, 1997;Tennant, Rawson, Cohen, & Mann, 1984;Washton, Pottash, & Gold, 1984). Each of these interventions has been shown to increase compliance and efficacy, but they have not been widely applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As a result, several different intervention styles have been developed to promote continued adherence on naltrexone. These include family monitoring (Anton, Hogan, Jalali, Riordan, & Kleber, 1981; Summers & Stone, 2002), intensive behavioral counseling (Nunes, Rothenberg, Sullivan, Carpenter, & Kleber, 2006; Rawson et al, 2001; Roozen, Kerkhof, & van den Brink, 2003), and provision of monetary-based incentives to encourage continued adherence (Carroll et al, 2001; Grabowski et al, 1979; Preston et al, 1999). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%