2014
DOI: 10.1111/infa.12058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Contingent Reinforcement of Actions on Infants' Object‐Directed Reaching

Abstract: The role of contingency learning was examined in 3‐month‐old infants' reaching movements. Infants in the experimental group experienced 9 min of active training during which they could move their arms in a reach‐like fashion to pull and move a mobile. Infants in the control group experienced 9 min of passive training during which they watched a mobile move. Prior to (pre‐training) and following the mobile experience (post‐training), infants in both conditions were given an opportunity to interact with a rattle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this argument, any kind of contingent experience is arousing and may serve to activate infants' exploratory systems. However, according to a recent experiment, this seems unlikely to be the case (Needham, Joh, Wiesen, & Williams, 2014). In this study, infants in the experimental condition were able to control the movement of a nearby mobile via a ribbon attached to their wrist and to the mobile.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to this argument, any kind of contingent experience is arousing and may serve to activate infants' exploratory systems. However, according to a recent experiment, this seems unlikely to be the case (Needham, Joh, Wiesen, & Williams, 2014). In this study, infants in the experimental condition were able to control the movement of a nearby mobile via a ribbon attached to their wrist and to the mobile.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Specifically, the infants in the experimental condition, who could control the movement of the mobile, should have explored objects more than the infants the control condition, who could not control the mobile's movement (Needham et al, 2014). However, there were no statistically significant differences in object exploration between the experimental and control groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These movement experiences have been used as induced trainings to advance or enhance the amount and duration of object-directed manual behaviors in typically developing infants and at-risk infants over 1-2 brief-term sessions or daily sessions. In general, authors have suggested these trainings provide infants with opportunities to improve upper limb control 8,9,11 , select more efficient movement patterns 6,8,9,11 , become motivated and engaged 10,12 , and learn to couple object perception and movement action 6,10 . These trainings, therefore, can be considered interesting tools to potentiate early manual development in typical infants and to prevent or minimize manual impairment in infants at risk for developmental disorders during early intervention practice.…”
Section: What Did the Researchers Do And Find?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other approach used to train infants' manual behavior was contingent reinforcement, in which infants were induced to notice the consequences their upper limbs' actions have on nearby objects by means of a mobile 12 or moving/sounding toys 11 . Active training moving a mobile with the arm during a single session of 9 minutes benefited the number of hand-toy contacts in pre-reaching typically developing infants 12 . Three-month-old infants' hand-toy contacts were also benefited from a daily 10-minute training actively boosting a sounding and moving toy with the hand over 2 weeks 11 .…”
Section: What Have These Studies Found?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…67 Typically developing 3-month-old infants also exhibited increased reaching movements when provided with contingent reinforcement. 68 It is unknown whether these mechanisms will operate in a similar fashion for children with DS. Pending future evidence, early intervention services may be able to shape how children with DS respond to therapeutic tasks to increase their growth trajectory across multiple domains.…”
Section: Addressing Child Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%