1993
DOI: 10.5465/256642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Continuance, Affective, and Moral Commitment on the Withdrawal Process: an Evaluation of Eight Structural Equation Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
122
0
10

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
3
122
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Jaros et al (1993), the past two decades have seen the definition of organization commitment evolve into a complex construct that stresses the insufficiency of single-factor models (Bennett and Durkin, 2000). The multidimensional approach poses that organization commitment is influenced by three constructs: emotional attachment (affective commitment), perceived costs (continuance commitment) and moral obligation (normative commitment) (Allen and Meyer, 1990).…”
Section: Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Jaros et al (1993), the past two decades have seen the definition of organization commitment evolve into a complex construct that stresses the insufficiency of single-factor models (Bennett and Durkin, 2000). The multidimensional approach poses that organization commitment is influenced by three constructs: emotional attachment (affective commitment), perceived costs (continuance commitment) and moral obligation (normative commitment) (Allen and Meyer, 1990).…”
Section: Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, different types of commitment have been proposed, including identification, value, calculative, affective, continuance, moral, and normative commitment. As a result, researchers have sought to further clarify and examine the construct of organizational commitment (Jaros, Jermier, Koehler, & Sincich, 1993;McGee & Ford, 1987;Meyer, Allen, & Gellatly, 1990;Shore & Wayne, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As Jaros et al (1993) underlines, the main distinction between affective commitment and moral commitment is that while the first is based on an emotional bond, the second is based on a rational bond. Therefore, it is reasonable to expect that employees with high levels of moral commitment should show the strongest binds towards his/her organization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…12) ''perceived obligation to pursue a course of action'' (pg. 308) (Based on Jaros et al, 1993) between normative and affective commitment and a lack of discriminating validity. For those authors, the conceptual consequence is that they consider normative commitment as an extension of affective commitment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%