2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.02.081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of conventional, severe, over, and re-shot peening processes on the fatigue behavior of mild carbon steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alikhani et al [ 7 ] reported similar findings that deformation layer depth was limited since the needed energy for deformation of the underlying layers do not reach deeper regions. Similarly, although peening time increases the deformation density, the kinetic energy of shots may not be enough to modify deeper layers [ 50 ] as peening time seems even insignificant in hardness improvement ( Figure 4 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alikhani et al [ 7 ] reported similar findings that deformation layer depth was limited since the needed energy for deformation of the underlying layers do not reach deeper regions. Similarly, although peening time increases the deformation density, the kinetic energy of shots may not be enough to modify deeper layers [ 50 ] as peening time seems even insignificant in hardness improvement ( Figure 4 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamentally being a mechanical surface treatment, shot peening is a complicated process, in which many parameters affect the process performance [ 20 , 49 , 50 , 51 ]. These can be classified into four main groups [ 52 ]: (1) shot characteristics (size [ 20 , 33 , 34 , 53 , 54 , 55 ], type [ 34 , 55 ], shape, density [ 34 ], hardness [ 34 , 53 ], and yield strength [ 20 , 33 , 34 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 56 , 57 ]); (2) process parameters [ 34 ] (shot flow rate, shot pressure [ 20 , 54 , 57 , 58 ], shot speed [ 59 ], impact angle [ 59 , 60 ], nozzle-to-target distance [ 60 ], nozzle diameter, and shot peening duration [ 20 , 32 , 60 , 61 ]); (3) target material properties (mechanical properties [ 34 ] such as hardness, yield strength, toughness, chemical composition and crystal structure [ 20 , 62 ]); and (4) environmental factors (temperature and humidity) [ 53 , 63 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to CSP [9,10,12], SSP produces stress profiles containing a high magnitude of compressive stresses penetrating quite deep beneath the free surface (see Figure 5). The maximum of these stresses can be found at a depth of 0.1 to 0.2 mm, followed by a steep decrease and change into tensile stresses in the deeper regions.…”
Section: Xrd Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Segurado et al [8] investigated the effect of different types of shots on surface morphology, residual stresses, and fatigue behaviour. Maleki et al [9] studied the influence of various CSP regimes on grain refinement, stress, and microhardness profiles, as well as on S-N curves. Maleki and Unal [10] studied the influence of surface coverage and the re-peening process on the properties of AISI 1045 steel after CSP as well as SSP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, coverage is defined as the ratio of the area covered by the shot impacts (dimples) to the complete surface of the treated sample, expressed as percentage. The degree of coverage does not increase linearly as a function of the peening time, the approximation to full coverage being exponential, so that full coverage is conventionally assessed when the target has an impacted area of 98 % [25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%