Effects of cooperative incentives and heterogeneous arrangement on achievement and interaction of cooperative learning groups in a college life science course

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the importance of cooperative incentives and heterogeneous grouping as elements of cooperative learning in a college life science course. Cooperative learning may be defined as a classroom learning environment in which students work together in heterogeneous groups toward completion of some task. Cooperative incentive structures provide some type of group reward based on group products or individual learning. In heterogeneous grouping, students are arranged in order to maximize variety within groups. A 2 × 2 design was utilized in this study. The independent variables considered included (a) use of cooperative incentives in learning groups, and (b) use of heterogeneous grouping in cooperative learning groups. Dependent variables for all treatment groups were scores from a multiple‐choice instrument developed for an earlier, related study, along with direct observational data on frequency of cooperative interactions. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used as the data analysis procedure for the achievement portion of the study, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for analysis of the cooperative interaction portion of the study. No significant differences were found between the treatment groups.

The effects of collaborative teamwork on secondary science

“…It could not be determined which, individual accountability (in the individual setting) or group accountability (in the team setting), was the more preferred structure for effective collaborative learning supported by networks. Such findings are similar to the ones in classroom collaborative learning research with or without computers done by Hooper & Hannafin (1991), and Watson & Marshall (1995). Neither of the two accountability modes could be proven to be better.…”

The effects of experience grouping on achievement, satisfaction, and problem-solving discourse in professional technical training

“…Watson and Marshall (1995) noted that ''Heterogeneous grouping of students in cooperative learning is so commonly accepted that it is often included as part of the definition of cooperative learning' ' (p. 292). The largest cooperative learning meta-study to date, however, indicated that homogeneous groupings may, on average, lead to higher achievement (Lou et al 1996).…”

Effects of Group Logo therapy Training on Self-Esteem, Communication Skills, and impact of event scale-revised (IES-R) in Elderly

“…Group logo therapy works through methods including expression of care and empathy, providing information, providing tools for diffusion of beliefs in solving problems, and helping the individual in recovering his or her attitude towards his or her own interpersonal world [10]. Various studies indicate the effectiveness of participatory learning on self-concept [11], increasing self-esteem and social acceptance of the learner [12], and motivation, self-efficacy, and constructive interaction with peers [13].…”