1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(19990901)36:4<436::aid-prot7>3.0.co;2-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of core-packing on the structure, function, and mechanics of a four-helix-bundle protein ROP

Abstract: The effects of core-packing on the structure, function and mechanics of the RNA-binding 4-helix-bundle Rop have been studied by molecular dynamics simulations. The structural, dynamical and geometrical properties of the Rop homodimer, (formed by the antiparallel juxtaposition of two helix-turn-helix motifs), have been compared with those of three protein variants described by Munson et al. (Protein Sci, 5:1584-1593, 1996), where the core of the native protein has been systematically repacked using a two-amino … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data show that the dynamic properties of each subunit are regulated by their b-sheet topology rather than by the hinge peptide regions. This result is in line with previous investigations carried out on topologically similar proteins (Ceruso et al, 1999b;Keskin et al, 2000;Merlino et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These data show that the dynamic properties of each subunit are regulated by their b-sheet topology rather than by the hinge peptide regions. This result is in line with previous investigations carried out on topologically similar proteins (Ceruso et al, 1999b;Keskin et al, 2000;Merlino et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This finding indicates that the b-sheet displays a breathing motion in both subunits. The comparison of the motions between the two N-Dimer structural units carried out by using the root mean-square inner product (Amadei et al, 1999;Ceruso et al, 1999bCeruso et al, , 2003Merlino et al, 2003) (RMSIP, see Methods for details) between the first 10 eigenvectors derived from the diagonalization of the covariance matrices (Table 1), reveals that they exhibit the same dynamic behavior. The high value of RMSIP indicates that the essential subspace spanned by the first 10 eigenvectors of the two N-Dimer structural units is largely overlapped (Table 1).…”
Section: C-interface Motions: Active Site Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated the root‐mean‐square inner product RMSIP (see Materials and Methods) between the first 10 eigenvectors of each simulation. It has been reported48, 49 that this number accounts for the (dis)similarity of the essential motions. For reference values, we have divided each trajectory in two halves and have calculated the inner product between the first 10 essential eigenvectors of each half.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This technique is a powerful tool for investigating the structural and dynamic behavior of biological macromolecules 15, 16. MD simulations have been frequently used to study the effect of single point mutations17, 18 as well as the stability of protein fragments 19. A number of computational studies have also started addressing features of protein thermal stability 20–31.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%