2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11846-012-0080-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of corporate equity ownership on firm value

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lim and Cu (2012) base their analysis on social network and contract characteristics and notice that entrepreneurs' private benefits affect the cooperation and control right sharing between entrepreneurs and VCs. Drees, Mietzner and Schiereck (2013) find that firm value is an important indicator of control right structure, and the private benefits of new shareholders also matter for control rights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Lim and Cu (2012) base their analysis on social network and contract characteristics and notice that entrepreneurs' private benefits affect the cooperation and control right sharing between entrepreneurs and VCs. Drees, Mietzner and Schiereck (2013) find that firm value is an important indicator of control right structure, and the private benefits of new shareholders also matter for control rights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…To predict the risk of information asymmetry, we follow Faccio and Masulis (2005) and Eckbo et al (2018) using deal-specific features, such as Crossindustry, Cross-border, and Unlisted Target. Cross-industry is a dummy variable equal to 1 if acquirers and targets are from different industries, measured by twodigit SIC codes (Drees et al 2013). Cross-border is a dummy variable equal to 1 if acquirers and targets are from different countries.…”
Section: Overvaluation and Misvaluation Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common reasons for corporate investments are to realize synergies or to gain access to the target's technology (Drees et al., 2013). For example, previous studies find that corporate blockholders are common when the target company invests in research and development (Fee et al., 2006) and when the products of the blockholder and the target company are complementary (Clayton & Jorgensen, 2011).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%