2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2011.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of cover crops on spider communities in tea plantations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the present study found that the abundances of predators or spiders were significantly higher in garlic-tobacco fields (Figures 4 and 5). These results are not consistent with the findings of Chen et al (2011) and Lin et al (2011). Their results showed that spider abundances and richess were not significantly affected by a cover crop in tea plantations or by polycultural manipulation in paddy fields Lin et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the present study found that the abundances of predators or spiders were significantly higher in garlic-tobacco fields (Figures 4 and 5). These results are not consistent with the findings of Chen et al (2011) and Lin et al (2011). Their results showed that spider abundances and richess were not significantly affected by a cover crop in tea plantations or by polycultural manipulation in paddy fields Lin et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Lin et al (2011) demonstrated that polycultures did not effectively optimise the structure of the spider guild nor increase its diversity in rice fields. Similarly, Chen et al (2011) found that the use of a cover crop in tea plantations did not change spider communities. In a highly diverse forest ecosystem in subtropical China, Schuldt et al (2011) reported that spider activities, abundance and species richness in fact decreased with increasing tree species richness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…crab spiders; Thomisidae). Previous reports have noted the importance of cursorial spiders (Miturgidae, Philodromidae, Anyphaenidae, Oxyopidae and Salticidae families) in woody and arable crops (Armendano & González, 2011;Chen, You, & Chen, 2011;Mansour & Whitecomb, 1986;Morris, Symondson, Kidd, & Campos, 1999;Pekár & Kocourek, 2004). In cotton crops, cursorial species appear to be among the most abundant spider groups (Mansour, 1987;Warui, Villet, & Young, 2004), preying not only on lepidopteran cotton-pest larvae but also on eggs (Pfannenstiel, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This group of spiders actively moves across the foliage in search of prey and may be harnessed for the control of pests such as Lepidoptera (Pérez-Guerrero et al 2013). Previous reports have noted the importance of cursorial spiders (Miturgidae, Philodromidae, Anyphaenidae, Oxyopidae and Salticidae families) in woody and arable crops (Armendano and González 2011;Chen et al 2011;Mansour and Whitecomb 1986;Morris et al 1999;Pekár and Kocourek 2004). Findings reported by some authors (Pfannenstiel 2008;Pérez-Guerrero et al 2013) focus particular attention on the genus Cheiracanthium as major hunters preying not only on lepidopteran larvae and eggs (Mansour et al 1980;Miliczky and Calkins 2002;Pfannenstiel 2008) but also on other taxa (Michaud 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%