Effects of crop residue managements and tillage practices on variations of soil penetration resistance in sloping farmland of Mollisols

Abstract

Soil penetration resistance (SPR) is one of the major indicators of soil physical properties. Crop residue managements, tillage practices and their interactions exert significant effects on the SPR. However, rare information is available in the sloping farmland of Mollisols. Field experiments were conducted to investigate the variations of the SPR as affected by crop residue managements and tillage practices on the sloping land in Northeast China from 2015 to 2019. The split-plot experiment was arranged with two crop residue managements (removed, REM and retained, RET), and three tillage practices (no tillage, NT; rotary tillage, RT; plow tillage, PT). SPR data in 0-80 cm soil depth was measured at the end of harvest of maize monoculture. Results showed that the two crop residue managements induced significant variations in the SPR at 0-15 cm, 15-30 cm and 0-80 cm soil depths under NT, RT, and PT treatments, respectively. In comparison with RET treatment, the average values of the SPR under REM treatment were 10.9% and 8.9% higher in 45-60 cm and 60-80 cm soil depths, respectively. The average values of the SPR under PT treatment were 12.4% and 14.1% lower in 0-15 cm soil depth, and 23.9% and 10.4% lower in 15-30 cm soil depth than those under NT and RT treatments. However, the average value of the SPR under PT treatment was 11.2% and 22.0% higher in 60-80 cm soil depth than those under NT and RT treatments, respectively. The SPR generally decreased with the slope position declined in the deeper soil depth (except for the NT+RET treatment). The findings from this research can provide a scientific reference for the establishment of rational cultivation and the sustainable development of productivity on the sloping land of Mollisols in cold regions.

Seeding Performance Caused by Inclination Angle in a Centralized Seed-Metering Device for Rapeseed

“…The seedlings' distribution was more uniform at a lower inclination angle (<6 • ) and seedling uniformity required further investigation to improve seed-filling and seeding performance. Larger inclination angles are known to markedly decrease the seeding performance and seedling distribution uniformity [7,29].…”

Uso do penetrômetro eletrônico manual na avaliação da resistência do solo em sistemas de cultivo com plantas de cobertura

“…Os solos agrícolas possuem grande diversidade de serviços ecológicos, como exemplo podemos citar o crescimento de raízes, aeração, movimentação da água, entre outros. Estes serviços ecológicos são diretamente influenciados pelas propriedades físicas do solo (Moitzi & Wagentristl, 2022) e a resistência do solo à penetração é um dos principais fatores destas propriedades, onde o preparo do solo, as culturas implantadas e o manejo das culturas exercem efeito significativo sobre a resistência do solo à penetração (Wang et al, 2022).…”

“…Solos compactados diminuem a produtividade das culturas através do impedimento da expansão do sistema radicular e consequentemente acesso limitados aos reservatórios de nutrientes e água do solo (Colombi & Keller, 2019). A utilização de rotação de cultura com espécies de plantas de cobertura com diferentes posicionamentos de raízes pode auxiliar na descompactação do solo, modificando assim suas propriedades físicas (Wang et. al., 2022), estas práticas são essenciais para a consolidação do Sistema de plantio direto (Moura et al, 2015).…”

Soil Erosion Control from Trash Residues at Varying Land Slopes Under Simulated Rainfall Conditions

“…There have been a number of studies evaluating how different surface coverings reduce surface runoff and soil loss, including rock fragments [54][55][56][57][58], biological geotextiles [30], and crop residues [59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66], grass [67][68][69], geo-textiles [30,70], post-fire ash and cover [71][72][73], tillage [64,66,74,75], and combined cover such as rock and litter [76][77][78][79]. However, little leaf litter has been tested [42,80], with varying results [81].…”