IntroductionAn often proposed tool of continual education is the practice audit (1, 2). The practice audit is, in effect, a performance review. It is an opportunity for the appraisal (by self or others) of patient care, with specific measures considered for improvement. Practice audits may improve practice efficiency and effectiveness, reduce clinical errors, demonstrate quality care to stakeholders, promote high standards of practice, lower the risk of liability, and foster practice change. However, a benefit that is usually overlooked is the possibility of publication of the results of a practice audit. Publication (research) has a number of benefits for the clinician, including skill development as a scholar, communicator, professional, and collaborator. A practice audit is beneficial to an individual physician; furthermore, publication of the audit results could be beneficial for many others such as health care providers, patients, and other stakeholders in a health care system. There is also the possibility of practice-audit-publish. Although there are extensive guidelines dealing with how to conduct a practice audit, they focus on practice improvement as the main goal; they also do not consider the audit as a means to become a researcher and to publish results (2). Yet, the important steps in planning and carrying out a practice audit can be captured by thinking about how a research publication evolves. Thus, a good researcher is a good practice auditor.Although practice audits are not the "breakthrough" publications, they tell us about things that happen every day in our practices. Practice audits reflect the challenges of practice, and the results of a practice audit are often immediately relevant to practitioners in many centers who face the same challenges. To date, I have been conducting practice audits for several years with publications as one of the outcomes. Using the approach described below, I have published 30 original research papers (3-32). The subjects of these practice audits (and subsequent studies) are clearly the patients referred to my consultant practice. They have undergone a usual practice assessment, including history, physical examination, occasionally collection of health questionnaire data, investigations, and treatment with outcomes noted. The distinct feature of the practice-audit-publish program is the order of effort. Because the possibility of a publication is under consideration, the order of thinking changes. First, one asks a research question that a practice audit might be able to answer. Then, one checks if the data required to answer the question is already a part of usual practice or if an alteration of the usual practice is necessary (i.e., being more deliberate in collecting the same data in all patients). Data is then collected to answer a research question and a publication is possible. Hence, the practice audit begins with first considering how one would publish the results if they were of interest.The process of practice-audit-publishStep 1. Think about...