2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(02)00025-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of daily protein intake levels on the oral stereotypic behaviours in energy restricted lambs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher level of protein intake in energy restricted condition causes an increase in energy deficiency (Yurtman et al, 2002), which may eventually result in reduced serum glucose with concomitant increase in serum urea (Hibbitt, 1988). In the present study also, serum levels of urea were increased (p<0.001) in both the energy-deficient groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher level of protein intake in energy restricted condition causes an increase in energy deficiency (Yurtman et al, 2002), which may eventually result in reduced serum glucose with concomitant increase in serum urea (Hibbitt, 1988). In the present study also, serum levels of urea were increased (p<0.001) in both the energy-deficient groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…under a restricted regimen, have been also seldom studied (e.g. in lambs, Yurtman et al, 2002). The consequences of a reduction in dietary protein content, that have become relevant after the Nitrate Directive and its restrictions on nitrogen emissions, have mainly focussed on productive aspects such as meat quality or growth (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2008) also observed that calves fed restricted quantities of milk ingested their available milk allotment faster than calves given ad libitum access to milk, suggesting that it was likely associated to hunger. In this sense, restricted levels of intake can also result in development of some stereotypies, like bar biting and feeder‐chewing (Cooper and Jackson, 1996; Yurtman et al., 2002), which have been related to an increased feeding motivation (Redbo et al., 1996). In our study, stereotyped behaviour was clearly stimulated by feed restriction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%