2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of decision making on landing mechanics as a function of task and sex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study performed by Mache et al [63] compared landing kinetics and kinematics between anticipated and unanticipated conditions. In this study, anticipated condition at initial contact produced lower hip and knee flexion, lower knee abduction and higher ankle plantar flexion in the drop jump, and lower hip abduction and higher ankle plantar flexion in drop landing compared with preplanned condition.…”
Section: Knee Kinematics In Anticipated Vs Unanticipated Situationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A recent study performed by Mache et al [63] compared landing kinetics and kinematics between anticipated and unanticipated conditions. In this study, anticipated condition at initial contact produced lower hip and knee flexion, lower knee abduction and higher ankle plantar flexion in the drop jump, and lower hip abduction and higher ankle plantar flexion in drop landing compared with preplanned condition.…”
Section: Knee Kinematics In Anticipated Vs Unanticipated Situationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Given the aforementioned discrepancies among studies that have addressed the effects of anticipation on neuromechanical changes of the lower extremity, 9,14,17,18,23,24 it may also be prudent to consider general limitations to unanticipated models that are commonly used in the literature. Arguably, participants may simply assume less dangerous landing mechanics when completing tasks under unanticipated conditions compared with anticipated conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers, therefore, try to mimic the uncertainty of these conditions by having participants perform tasks without knowing which direction to move in before they actually initiate the movement. 7,9,12,14,15,17,18,23,24 It is interesting, however, that direct comparisons between lower extremity mechanics performed under anticipated and unanticipated conditions have not been conducted as often as comparisons between groups that performed only unanticipated conditions. Yet, analyzing biomechanical and neuromuscular variables under either condition alone may not provide sufficient information about the neuromechanical strategies that athletes adopt when faced with situations that more closely resemble the dynamic athletic environment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tasks do not reflect the random nature of sports where participants are often required to respond to a number of different stimuli simultaneously and have to make adjustments during landing/cutting activity in response to these stimuli. This has led to recent research examining landing biomechanics during anticipated and unanticipated tasks to investigate the effects of decision-making on landing biomechanics (Brown, Palmieri-Smith, & McLean, 2009;Houck, Duncan, & De Haven, 2006;Mache, Hoffman, Hannigan, Golden, & Pavol, 2013;McLean, Borotikar, & Lucey, 2010). For example, Houck et al, (2006) compared trunk orientation in the frontal plane (trunk position relative to the global vertical position), trunk lateral flexion (trunk position relative to the pelvis segment), lateral foot placement, frontal plane hip angle along with hip and knee moments in the frontal plane during anticipated and unanticipated straight line walking and side cutting (approximately 50°change of direction) tasks.…”
Section: The Effects Of Decision Making On Landing/cutting Biomechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since ACL injury is likely to occur during more dynamic activities it limits the validity of the findings of this study and more research needs to be done in activities more representative of tasks in which ACL injury is common. In addition, as with Mache et al, (2013), all unanticipated tasks were completed after the anticipated tasks. The non-randomised order of the pre-planned and decision-making conditions suggest that learning and fatigue effects may have occurred, limiting the strength of any conclusions made.…”
Section: The Effects Of Decision Making On Landing/cutting Biomechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%