2014
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.7247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Decontamination of the Oropharynx and Intestinal Tract on Antibiotic Resistance in ICUs

Abstract: trialregister.nlIdentifier: NTR1780.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
119
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(31 reference statements)
5
119
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Two general approaches have been investigated to “manipulate” the ICU microbiome: probiotic administration and selective decontamination of the skin, gut, or oropharynx. Each of these strategies carries documented risks (e.g., antibiotic resistance) and benefits (e.g., reduced incidence of nosocomial infections) [3436]. Importantly, these strategies have been implemented without personalized knowledge of the microbiota in the patients receiving these interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two general approaches have been investigated to “manipulate” the ICU microbiome: probiotic administration and selective decontamination of the skin, gut, or oropharynx. Each of these strategies carries documented risks (e.g., antibiotic resistance) and benefits (e.g., reduced incidence of nosocomial infections) [3436]. Importantly, these strategies have been implemented without personalized knowledge of the microbiota in the patients receiving these interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colonized patients pose an epidemiological threat to other hospitalized individuals and to members of their households [6,7] but are also in danger of developing systemic infections with gut-colonizing microorganisms [8,9]. This is especially the case for patients with blood disorders due to suppression of their innate and/or acquired immunity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the included patients, 73 participated in one of two controlled, cluster-randomised crossover studies in which SOD, SDD and no antibiotics [11] or SOD and SDD [12] were compared. In these studies, the treatment regime would only be assigned if the anticipated stay in the ICU was more than 72 h and/or expected duration of intubation was more than 48 h. Therefore, in order to equalize our inclusion criteria, all included patients outside these study periods had to have an ICU length-of-stay of at least 72 h, irrespective of intubation status.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%