2019
DOI: 10.1002/jaba.642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of decreasing intersession interval duration on graduated exposure treatment during simulated routine dental care

Abstract: Reports suggest that individuals with developmental disabilities often engage in behavior during dental visits that precludes regular dental care. Graduated exposure therapies are an effective treatment for avoidant behavior in people with developmental delays, and some studies show that the duration of the intersession interval (ISI) can impact the effectiveness of graduated exposure treatments for typically developing individuals. The current study examined the effects of decreasing ISI on outcomes of a grad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of treatment approach is consistent with the literature on the use of graduated exposure to treat other escape‐maintained behavior repertoires (e.g., Schmidt et al., 2013 [nonpreferred activities]; Szalinski et al., 2019 [dental procedures]). Graduated exposure proceeds by successively fading in an aversive stimulus and differentially reinforcing compliance with an approach response (i.e., compliance with a medical procedure; Allen & Kupzyk, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This type of treatment approach is consistent with the literature on the use of graduated exposure to treat other escape‐maintained behavior repertoires (e.g., Schmidt et al., 2013 [nonpreferred activities]; Szalinski et al., 2019 [dental procedures]). Graduated exposure proceeds by successively fading in an aversive stimulus and differentially reinforcing compliance with an approach response (i.e., compliance with a medical procedure; Allen & Kupzyk, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…“The second phase consisted of graduated exposure to the contextual variables that evoked aerophagia”. This method of gradually introducing contexts that evoke problematic behavior is consistent with graduated exposure therapy (e.g., Allen & Kupzyk, 2016 [medical procedures]; Schmidt et al, 2013 [nonpreferred activities]; Szalwinski et al, 2019 [dental procedures]), where the presumably aversive stimulus is introduced gradually and approach responses are reinforced. In our case, we increased the number of experimenters present during the session from one to two (at session 77).…”
Section: Course Of Treatment and Assessment Of Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such assessment and treatment approaches have been demonstrated to be highly successful for a wide range of topographies of behavior, including different other forms of self-injury, aggression, and disruption (Beavers et al, 2013). We specifically want to highlight that the use of graduated exposure procedures can be highly effective for escape-maintained behaviors that are common in individuals diagnosed with phobias (e.g., Allen & Kupzyk, 2016 [medical procedures]; Schmidt et al, 2013 [nonpreferred activities]; Szalwinski et al, 2019 [dental procedures]). Our study extended this graduated exposure literature by demonstrating the effectiveness of these procedures on behaviors that are not escape maintained.…”
Section: Recommendations To Clinicians and Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have also identified several evidence-based behavioral interventions that are effective for increasing cooperation or decreasing fear-correlated measures (e.g., crying or screaming) during health care procedures (for reviews, see Kupzyk & Allen, 2019 ; St. Joseph & Machalicek, 2022 ). These interventions include gradually exposing the patient to elements of the procedure (e.g., Cavalari et al, 2013 ; Grider et al, 2012 ; Kupzyk & Allen, 2019 ; Szalwinski et al, 2019 ), pairing preferred items or activities with putative aversive procedures (Gorski et al, 2004 ; Jensen et al, 2020 ; Nordahl et al, 2016 ), providing frequent breaks from the procedures (O’Callaghan et al, 2006 ), preventing escape from the procedure contingent on disruptive behavior (i.e., escape extinction; Szalwinski et al, 2019 ), and providing reinforcement for cooperation (Cavalari et al, 2013 ; Grider et al, 2012 ; Stuesser & Roscoe, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%