1966
DOI: 10.2527/jas1966.253765x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Defaunation on Feed Digestibility, Rumen Metabolism and Blood Metabolites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
27
2

Year Published

1967
1967
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
27
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several authors have observed that defaunation increases the number of total bacterial population in the rumen by classical bacterial viable counts [19,22]. Our results, though not significant, suggest that total bacteria in the rumen tended to increase after defaunation and were in agreement with previous results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Several authors have observed that defaunation increases the number of total bacterial population in the rumen by classical bacterial viable counts [19,22]. Our results, though not significant, suggest that total bacteria in the rumen tended to increase after defaunation and were in agreement with previous results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The differences in rumen ammonia-N would not affect these levels with an N intake as high as in the present experiment23). In all the experiments the digestibility of N tended to be higher in the faunated animals as reported by some workers 12,24). This may be explained by the superior digestibility of protozoal cells compared to bacterial cells25).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Over the past twenty years, many studies comparing conventional (naturally faunated) animals with protozoa-free (ciliate-free) animals have been carried out. However, no definite conclusions have been drawn on ciliates because of the contradictory results obtained on growing animals (Bryant and Small, 1960 ;Eadie, 1962 ;Abou Akkada and El Shazly, 1964 ; Christiansen, Kawashima and Burroughs, 1965 ;Borhami et al, 1967 ;Chalmers et al, 1968) and on feed digestion (Abou Akkada andEl Shazly,1964,1965 ;Barringer, Trenkle and Burroughs, 1966 ; Klopfenstein, Purser and Tyznik, 1966 ;Luther, Trenkle and Burroughs, 1966 ;Kurihara et al, 1968 ;Males and Purser, 1970 ;ltabashi and Kandatsu, 1975 ;Jouany, 1975). Ciliates have shown wide differences in their effects in vitro on carbohydrate metabolism (Abou Akkada, 1965 ;Hungate, 1966 ;Church, 1975 ;Clarke, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%