1998
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.57.15496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of defect structures at surfaces and thin films on grazing scattering of fast ions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observation is in clear contrast with the assumption of a saturated attractive level shift derived from linear response theory or concepts of classical image charges. Note that the enhanced width for higher E z is dominated by effects caused by thermal vibrations of lattice atoms, whereas charge exchange plays a negligible role in this respect [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observation is in clear contrast with the assumption of a saturated attractive level shift derived from linear response theory or concepts of classical image charges. Note that the enhanced width for higher E z is dominated by effects caused by thermal vibrations of lattice atoms, whereas charge exchange plays a negligible role in this respect [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growth-induced irregularities such as nucleated islands affect the correlated scattering process and the specularbeam intensity. Thus island densities are deduced from best fits of the measured intensities to computer simulations using classical trajectories [14,15]. We find that the density is saturated and nearly constant in a wide range of coverages between about 0.2 and 0.6 monolayers (ML).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, structural imperfections like surface steps mediate penetration of some projectiles, leading to a contribution of excited electrons from layers beneath the surface. From computer simulations emulating ion trajectories [23] and an overlayer experiment [21], we infer for scattering of 25 keV protons from our Fe(100) surface a probing depth of λ = (0.5 ± 0.2) ML for electrons of 10 − 20 eV kinetic energy. We note that λ seems to increase for lower electron energies owing to cascade multiplication governed by electron-electron scattering [21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%