2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2015.07.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of density ratio, rotation speed, and fill level on density-induced granular streak segregation in a rotating drum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Flowing mixtures of granular material with differing properties, including size [2][3][4][5][6][7][8], density [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], surface roughness [17,18], and shape [19,20], tend to segregate, and they are common in geophysical flows [21][22][23][24] and industrial settings such as during hopper filling and discharging [25][26][27], in rotating tumblers [9,[28][29][30][31][32], and in chute flow [1,33,34]. The simplest explanation for segregation relies on the idea, for size-disperse mixtures, that small particles fall through voids generated between large particles and accumulate in the lower regions of the flowing layer, while large particles are forced upward by concentrated regions of small particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flowing mixtures of granular material with differing properties, including size [2][3][4][5][6][7][8], density [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], surface roughness [17,18], and shape [19,20], tend to segregate, and they are common in geophysical flows [21][22][23][24] and industrial settings such as during hopper filling and discharging [25][26][27], in rotating tumblers [9,[28][29][30][31][32], and in chute flow [1,33,34]. The simplest explanation for segregation relies on the idea, for size-disperse mixtures, that small particles fall through voids generated between large particles and accumulate in the lower regions of the flowing layer, while large particles are forced upward by concentrated regions of small particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among different particle properties that can drive segregation, particle size [13] and density [14] are critical factors. The focus of this work is the segregation due to differences in particle density, which can occur in vibrated granular mixtures [15][16][17][18][19], free surface flows [20][21][22][23][24] and vertical chute flows [25]. In gravity-driven free surface flows, particles with lower density are more likely to rise to the free surface while particles with higher density are more likely to segregate to the bottom of the flowing layer, resulting in segregation patterns such as a segregated core or streaks of heavier particles in rotating tumblers [14,[21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus of this work is the segregation due to differences in particle density, which can occur in vibrated granular mixtures [15][16][17][18][19], free surface flows [20][21][22][23][24] and vertical chute flows [25]. In gravity-driven free surface flows, particles with lower density are more likely to rise to the free surface while particles with higher density are more likely to segregate to the bottom of the flowing layer, resulting in segregation patterns such as a segregated core or streaks of heavier particles in rotating tumblers [14,[21][22][23]. While particle-based simulation methods can reproduce density-driven segregation phenomena on a small scale, an accurate continuum-based model would be of clear practical and theoretical value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stratification via flow modulation occurs in tridisperse size mixtures and should also occur for mixtures of particles differing in material density, because density segregation in bounded heaps shares many similarities with size segregation [51] and layering of density bidisperse materials has been observed in rotating tumbler flow [62]. Further work is necessary to better explore these topics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%