2005
DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2006.55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Dietary Selenium Supplementation on Growth Performance, Selenium Retention in Tissues and Nutrient Digestibility in Growing-finishing Pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
8
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, many previous reports were suggested that the selenium supplementation had no effect on growth performance Mateo et al, 2007). In this study, growth performance was not improved but Se concentrations in serum and tissues were increased which were generally consistent with previous researches (Kim and Mahan, 2001a, b, c;Tian et al, 2006a, b). Interestingly, improved gain-to-feed ratio was observed when pigs were fed Se yeast B or Se-proteinate compared to Se yeast A.…”
Section: Growth Performancesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, many previous reports were suggested that the selenium supplementation had no effect on growth performance Mateo et al, 2007). In this study, growth performance was not improved but Se concentrations in serum and tissues were increased which were generally consistent with previous researches (Kim and Mahan, 2001a, b, c;Tian et al, 2006a, b). Interestingly, improved gain-to-feed ratio was observed when pigs were fed Se yeast B or Se-proteinate compared to Se yeast A.…”
Section: Growth Performancesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, DM, OM and CP intake were influenced by OS supplementation in the present study, which is consistent with the findings of Hemken (1998) who reported a significant increase in the daily DM intake in 0.15 and 0.3 ppm Se-supplemented lactating cows when compared to the unsupplemented cows. On the other hand, Tian et al (2006) showed that pigs fed organic Se had a greater DMI when compared with unsupplemented animals fed during the growing phase, while Payne and Southern (2005) showed no effect for broilers. The selenium concentration of basal diets in Tian et al (2006) study was 0.06 ppm and in Payne and Southern (2005) experiment the selenium concentration of basal diets in starter and grower were 0.12 ppm and in finisher was 0.11 ppm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The greatest concentrations were achieved in the kidneys and adrenals in rats when given selenomethionine [38] . In pigs, selenium concentration was generally the highest in the kidney after administration of selenomethionine [39] . However, in the mouse, the liver absorbed the injected selenomethionine more efficiently than did any other tissues, showing the highest selenium concentrations [40] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%