2017
DOI: 10.5536/kjps.2017.44.4.267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Dietary Silicate Based Complex Mineral on Performance, Egg Quality and Immunological Competence in Laying Hens

Abstract: This study was conducted to investigate the effect of feeding with dietary silicate based complex mineral (SCM) on the performance of laying hens. SCM at five levels (0%, 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6% and 0.8%) was added to commercial diets, and fed to four hundred fifty Hy-Line Brown from fifty four to sixty five weeks of age. Egg production increased as the addition of dietary SCM to basal diets increased up to 0.6% (P<0.05). Furthermore, Feed intake increased in a manner similar to that of egg production (P<0.05). Howev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…consisting of around 90% of ground minerals have been used as feed additives in poultry diets to improve their production performance (Safaeikatouli et al, 2012). Our result of improved EP by illite supplementation supported the findings of an earlier study (Lim et al, 2017), which reported that EP levels of hens fed a diet supplemented with dietary 0.6% silicate‐based mineral were increased. Chen, Liu, et al (2019) have reported that a villus height: crypt depth (VH:CD) of ileum from hens fed 1.2 g/kg silicate mineral (montmorillonite [MMT]) is increased compared with that fed a control diet.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…consisting of around 90% of ground minerals have been used as feed additives in poultry diets to improve their production performance (Safaeikatouli et al, 2012). Our result of improved EP by illite supplementation supported the findings of an earlier study (Lim et al, 2017), which reported that EP levels of hens fed a diet supplemented with dietary 0.6% silicate‐based mineral were increased. Chen, Liu, et al (2019) have reported that a villus height: crypt depth (VH:CD) of ileum from hens fed 1.2 g/kg silicate mineral (montmorillonite [MMT]) is increased compared with that fed a control diet.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…With respect to blood profiles of hens fed the diet with illite, our findings were similar with those of Hu et al (2019), who reported that higher IgG, IgA, and total antioxidant capacity (T‐AOC) levels were confirmed by illite addition (0.4%) in pigs. In addition, Lim et al (2017) showed that the inclusion of complex silicate minerals (0.6%) for laying hens increased bone density but had no effect on IL‐6. The IL‐6, which plays the induction of intercellular adhesion molecules and the recruitment of leukocytes, exerts an influence on the course of inflammation (Cronstein, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the differences found in shell and yolk could be related to the interactive effects of the calcined shell and bentonite, where there is a high ion exchange capacity that binds cations (Adams et al, 2005). Similarly, Lim et al (2017) found that using a silicate based complex mineral from 0.2% to 0.8% increased eggshell thickness in laying hens. In addition, Kermanshahi et al (2011) reported that using a clay mineral (natural zeolite) had no remarkable effect on yolk or albumen mass but, instead, affected yolk color.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This result suggests that improvements in albumen height and Haugh unit in laying hens with advancing age was the result of the properties of bentonite (Adam et al, 2005). Similarly, Lim et al (2017) showed that adding 0.2% to 0.8% of a silicate-based complex mineral to the diets of laying hens resulted in significantly higher albumen height and Haugh unit when compared to that of the control groups. Albumen height and Haugh unit are important indices for determining the quality of eggs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%