2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-021-05041-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of different crystallization methods on photocatalytic performance of TiO2 nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the reason why the EELS results show that the helium concentration in the inner crystalline structure is much lower than that in the glassy surface, especially that the helium bubbles all locates in the glassy layer. The ultrahigh stability [39,40] and dense atomic packing structure [41] of TiO 2 glass can retain the helium gas for ultra-long time. The high pressure in the helium bubbles of about 1-39 GPa also confirms that the glassy TiO 2 is an ideal reservoir to retain helium gas.…”
Section: Formation and Capture Mechanisms Of Helium Bubblesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the reason why the EELS results show that the helium concentration in the inner crystalline structure is much lower than that in the glassy surface, especially that the helium bubbles all locates in the glassy layer. The ultrahigh stability [39,40] and dense atomic packing structure [41] of TiO 2 glass can retain the helium gas for ultra-long time. The high pressure in the helium bubbles of about 1-39 GPa also confirms that the glassy TiO 2 is an ideal reservoir to retain helium gas.…”
Section: Formation and Capture Mechanisms Of Helium Bubblesmentioning
confidence: 99%